If anyone is not catching the Guatemala joke, this week they elected a comedian as their new president.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-34632485
If anyone is not catching the Guatemala joke, this week they elected a comedian as their new president.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-34632485
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/27/politi...oll/index.htmlFor the first time in months, a national poll shows Donald Trump is not leading the Republican 2016 primary race, and instead has Ben Carson in first place.
So has 538 reassessed their 2% chance for Trump taking the nomination? lol
Mother of god
http://www.monmouth.edu/assets/0/322...d1beab9bfb.pdf
In the first Monmouth University Poll of likely Iowa Democratic
caucusgoers in the 2016 cycle, Hillary Clinton holds a commanding 41 point lead over Bernie Sanders.
This is the first poll conducted after Clinton’s appearance before the Benghazi Committee and Joe
Biden’s announcement that he would not mount a presidential campaign.
Clinton currently garners the support of 65% of likely Democratic caucusgoers to 24% for Bernie
Sanders. Martin O’Malley clocks in at 5% and Larry Lessig has 1% of the vote. Clinton enjoys a large
lead over Sanders among both male (55% to 33%) and female (73% to 16%) voters. She also has an edge
across the ideological spectrum, leading among voters who are very liberal (57% to 34%), somewhat
liberal (68% to 22%), and moderate (69% to 19%).
but in 2008 she lost to Barack Obama
The Loras College poll in Iowa shows her up 38 points too. Hilldog the Inevitable is back on, folks, I repeat, Hilldog the Inevitable is a go.
Clearly the polling methodology was flawed since it did not adequately correct the numbers for the "Bernie fills up stadiums" factor which indicates Bernie can and will win.
She still might die just in time.
Wake up sheeple!
Bernie had better step up his New Hampshire game or he's going to win Vermont and nothing else.
Their methodology was heavy on landlines and only had 7% 18-35. I understand normally for primaries we have low youth turnout (and low turnout in general), but 76% polled were 50 and older. Do people really think youth vote is going to go that badly this time around? lol
Again, the poll wasn't random, it was "likely voters", hence the age gap.
I'm sorry, in 2008, 14% of primary voters were ages 18-35 (in all states, median). That number was 22% in Iowa. Give Bernie a benefit of the doubt and say he gets 20% because I'm not convinced he gets out more youth than Obama. That's still a massive gap to close. And superdelegates.
Reality is going to have to set in eventually for you guys.
If Hilary ends up as the dem nom, I will vote Trump just to see the world burn.
The Irony is that I'm watching Chris Hayes with upcoming segments on how both Trump and Clinton camps have problems with recent poll numbers? lol