Did Bohner already kick the debt ceiling til 2017? I didn't think that was finalized.
Did Bohner already kick the debt ceiling til 2017? I didn't think that was finalized.
I love how people think Sanders is going to be effective on climate change when he campaigned to close his own state's nuclear plant and spiked the state's carbon emissions.
His heart might be in the right place but his policies are shit in that arena.
Anyone against Nuclear power is a mouth breather, lol.
Sanders is against Nuclear power? Is this a standing position?
If so, fuck him. And fuck anyone who thinks we are going to scale back any level of CC without nuclear power to cover the ~30 or more year gap before electricity really becomes viable for the entire country.
From 2015:
http://www.fastcoexist.com/3046530/b...ellian-society"I do not support more nuclear power plants when we do not know how we get rid of the toxic waste from the ones that already exist," the senator said.
He's fuckin clueless.
Ugh. Yeah get him the fuck out of here. I am fully aware Hillary won't do anything positive re: NP but ambivalence, in this case, is far better than being against it.
Motherfucker wants to run an entire country, doesn't know that plants which run off of old "waste" have been a reality for a while now.
Out of all people, Sanders is the only politician in recent history who is actually rational about adapting and evolving his views to fit the best situation.
I didn't see ya'll posting such ire against Hilldog's fake reversal of opinions on issues where she is clearly beholden to those who she claims to now be against. Spare us.
Nobody cares, but Hillary has expressed her love for the death penalty(also, is for raising retirement age), Bernie against.
Bernie has also come out against Federal ban on Marijuana--wants to take it off the scheduled list. https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...ea1_story.html
Bernie pledges to fight Islamophobia:
I'm simply pointing out that "Bernie is the Climate Change Candidate" stuff from last page is silly, that's all.
If someone was posting about how Hillary is the social justice candidate you'd tell them to get the fuck out of here too.
I think Bernie just wants us to all be running off solar and wind, which is obviously utopian shit, even though it shouldn't be at this stage.
Which is great if he runs for President a half century for now.
Since he isn't, it's a dumbshit position to take and if it's something that a person cares about, they will view him negatively for it.
I am against the death penalty, but not to the point where it would stop me from voting for someone. I am far more upset about being opposed to Nuclear power than I am about death penalty or not. Personal stances gonna be personal.
I also couldn't give one iota of a fuck about whether weed is legal or not.
Most of Hillary's toxic positions immediately effect the poor, PoC, and the elderly. This isn't just about what is moral right or wrong.
From what I remember, I believe VT runs on essentially giant wood pellet stove power plants.
What the heck is "corporate welfare"?Bernie Sanders calls Ex-Im Bank "corporate welfare." She thinks that "makes absolutely no sense."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...ction=politics
http://pjmedia-new.pjmedia.netdna-cd...ton-shrugs.jpg
All people effected negatively every single day by the lack of a cheaper and more efficient source of energy, arguably more so since people regularly die in the north during winters due to not being able to afford to pay for heat.
Point is: your "these things matter!" Aren't more important than other "these things matter!"
If you want to do a surface-level comparison of the nation's quagmire on energy independence versus a black-and-white issue of millions of people sitting in prison for an herb + the millions who can survive/live healthier lives from legalization, be my guest. We don't even need to discuss all the other frightening prospects of austerity and corporate power under Clinton, we would need some sort of fantasy football scorer's system for that.
You're so cute when you're scientifically illiterate.
I didn't actually say anything that would suggest that I was, but I guess you aren't really concerned about these matters.
You think the gap between where we are as a country with medical marijuana can save/improve more lives than affordable energy to keep families from freezing to death in the winter.
That is pure fucking kool-aid logic. The measurable and accepted health benefits of MM exist, but are few. Pain management is not on the same fucking scale as not freezing to death, sorry. This is where you are scientifically illiterate, thinking marijuana will save millions of lives.
You want to call the energy crisis a quagmire and then say the issue regarding medical marijuana is black and white. You are either willfully retarded or have no idea what clinically proven benefits of MM are and no idea what a serious problem a lack of affordable heating means to families all over the country.
Edit: have some sources
http://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/t...p/cannabis-pdq
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3358713/
http://m.cmaj.ca/content/early/2012/...j.110837.short
Pain management? Sure. Saving lives? You high bro
Edit 2:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr076.pdf
Minorities and the elderly have a significantly higher chance statistically to succumb to heat stroke or hypothermia that results in death.
You are aware that a not insignificant number of installed winter heating solutions are fuel based not electric based, so see no benefit from energy gains, right?
And if you have trouble affording heating, you probably can't afford a refit anyway.
Say, which candidate is the most likely to tackle issues relating to the average persons income? Hmmm, name is on the tip of my tongue, but it's just not coming to me at the moment.