And yet it's still not as bad as Jefe in the soccer thread.
And yet it's still not as bad as Jefe in the soccer thread.
Those other people that did it also aren't running for control of the most powerful political position in the world, yes the Clinton name carries with it a large hate magnet, but it's also an infinite use get out of jail free card, when was the last time a Clinton was held accountable for any of their scandals anyways?
I don't get what's so hard to understand about being irritated and very annoyed that her last name is the only reason she isn't out of a job right now. That seeing people in power get off Scott free when some pleb would have had his life, at the very least, be temporarily ruined over something like this. Am I still voting for her? I really have no choice in the matter, but that doesn't mean I have to like it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
What job exactly would she be out of? She's not Secretary of State anymore.
Lol fucking really? If I did setup a server that was housing TS or S level information is someones house, I would NEVER...EVER... have a job in IT again. But hey, she's Clinton so most of you here really just don't give a flying fuck about procedure and are perfectly ok with people with status, money, and names not being held responsible for what they do.
That doesn't really answer my question, one, and two, I haven't voiced any opinion one way or the other so go jump up someone else's dick.
Salodin said she should be out of a job. But she is out of the job already. She was out of it before this became a national issue.
I doubt we have ever had a president who understands how that kind of shit works. People at the top are too busy with other things to learn how it works. They hire people to know how it works for them. Have you ever worked in IT for a company and had to deal with the CEO or CFO? Unless it is a tech startup they probably know nothing. I am amazed how someone can get so high in an organization without even basic computer knowledge and skills but it happens all the time.
Yes, but again, this came to light after her time in the State Department, and she wasn't rank-and-file, she was Secretary of State doing what the previous two Secretaries had done. Just drop that argument.
The director of the FBI said she was grossly negligent, and the statute at issue directs anyone grossly negligent with matters of national security to be fined or face up to 10 years in prison. I'm holding out hope DoJ goes for the fine to at least pay lip service to the idea that laws are applied equally.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Ok here's the heart of the issue.
Her escaping prosecution had nothing to do with her name being Clinton. It was because she was SoS. A CEO gets to do shit that a rank-and-file employee can't. The reason legal experts all said an indictment wasn't likely isn't because Clinton has too much shadow teflon, but because no prosecutor goes after a high level official for this crap. Rice, Powell, Albright, Kerry could all have done the exact same shit and gotten away with it.
Hell, it probably was more of an issue that it otherwise would be because her name was Clinton. The Clintons aren't prone to scandals, it's just that people hate them so much they make mountains out of molehills when they are involved dreaming of some "Gotcha!" moment. When Benghazi didn't work, they just moved onto this.
I think if she had copped to knowing that there was classified material involved, they would've charged her. Her holding the line that she didn't knowingly send or receive material marked classified at the time means that the case wasn't a slam dunk, and prosecutors aren't likely to ruin a presidential candidate with an indictment if a guilty verdict isn't a sure thing.
Trump is getting similar treatment with the Trump U case being pushed until after the election.
Of course. Officers always get special treatment. Like on the same boat one officer doesn't show up to duty on morning because he is still at a bar drinking... they send someone to pick him up and he stands duty... well wasn't really standing much but yeah completely drunk off his ass having the nubs go on ridiculous food runs like go to mcdonalds and ask for egg mcmuffins without eggs and sausage biscuits with bacon instead lol. And for the most part slept most the day. Anyways it was never mentioned at all anywhere. Few months later an enlisted guy looks tired on his first watch at noon admits he was drinking till 10 pm the night before but stopped so he'd have 8 hours before duty and they did a blood test and then some magical math to figure out he must have been over the limit a few hours earlier when he started duty and next thing you know 90 days restrictions and half months pay for I think 2 months. But young chief also gets his duis swept under the rug to an extent too so....
But yeah it's not just the tippy top and the Clintons that get special privileges. All along the way from the bottom to the top there is a different standards that gets applied. Sad fact of life
Yea, shame on you guys for holding public officials to a higher standard.
I mean, all Bill did was get a blow job and some vagina from a few interns. ALL politicians do it, therefore it's okay!
Look, I ain't voting for Trump even if a gun gets held to my head, but the amount of apologism for this shit is ridiculous. No one was expecting an indictment, but to actually say "yea she did some shit ordinary people would get fried for but no one will prosecute her so you'll just have to get over it" is fucked up.
Trump is smartly pushing back the announcement of speakers at the convention until tomorrow to let Hillary stew over the FBI tut-tutting for a day.
So let me just make something clear as well, it's not just Hilary but pretty much everyone with status and money being well above the law. We've seen it 100 times where politicians never pay for ANYTHING they do. I know some cases that they basically have to be above the law, but this isn't one of those cases.
Thank you this is exactly what I keep thinking every time someone says it is because she is a "Clinton". It is more about level of power than her name or who she is and it works the same way in private companies. It works the same way in the legal system for rich vs. poor etc. People in positions of power and privelage get to do things that other people cannot do.
Trump finally ramped up fundraising, pulled in 51M in June. Less than Clinton did and only half what Romney did 4 years ago in June, but it's a start.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...ng-june-225171
3.8M of that total was from Trump himself.
Also, Bernie got booed during a meeting with House Democrats, after they challenged him about when he will drop out and endorse Hillary, and he replied that
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...mocrats-225161"The goal isn't to win elections, the goal is to transform America," Sanders said at one point, according to multiple lawmakers and aides in the room.