I know January and February football is like an abstract concept to a Jet fan, but making the Superbowl means you went through the post season gauntlet to the final game. If the Superbowl was played in week #1, 4-2 might not be as impressive as 4-0, but it isn't, and post season games are hard.
4-2 in the Superbowl w/ 21 post season wins > 4-0 in the Superbowl w/ 16 post season wins.
Anyone who takes Montana over Brady doesn't want to enjoy post season success as often as they could otherwise.
besides that the logical fallacies the past two pages were fun
If Montana played in this brady rules league now, he would have 10 rings easy.
Brady won 3 rings when football was still football. Which rules were in place in 2001 and 2003 that was so different from Montana's era?
He won in 2004 after the Colts cried about the Patriots beating up Peyton's receivers to reemphasize illegal contact, but beyond that, it wasn't that much different.
Post-2009 I get it, and sympathize with the argument.
I think you look at Montana through rose colored nostalgia glasses. If you're a 49'er fan, that's cool, but if not, you're probably just hatin'
semi-related:
I think I have to get my gronk jersey within the year before he ends up dead and they skyrocket in price.
Gronk being goofy on Jimmy Kimmel right now
LOL Gronk is hilarious
Gronkl has the perfect facial structure to be santa claus
Ninja,
Montana is better than Brady. I wouldn't even have expected the media's arguments to be as bad as yours are, and yet here I am, thinking, "Man, I need to read more of Gregg Rosenthall, just to acclimate myself to merely stupid before trying to interact with normal society."
The worst part about you is that there IS a legitimate (several, really) case for Brady > Montana. You just haven't hit on any of them-- and here's a tip. NONE of them involve insulting people who claim different, and none of them are in the vein you're coming from. You're increasingly coming off as a recently divorced drunk on his fifteenth Jack, screaming at anyone and everyone with such incoherency that everyone wonders if we should call your Ex and give her a warning.
Be a fan, fine. Great, even-- fans are awesome, even if they're somewhat over-the-top. But right now, I'll take every Manning-loving Fox-worshiper over you, both in terms of enjoyment of their commentary and the accuracy of their analysis.
Not only is Montana a greater QB than Brady, there are two others in contention before Brady can ever sniff a claim, and a third and a fourth who could nudge Brady out of top five (though I think only one of those actually has a claim). Brady's a great QB. He's blatantly the best of his generation, and is one of the best all time, but there is no rational conversation that can be had that places him so obviously #1 that you can get away with the absolute garbage you've been spewing.
Your avatar sums up that post.
has this been posted?
Too many pages to sort thru since i was last here
Edit: It has.
Not sure if timestamps work when you embed, but if not start from 8:12 or clicky: https://www.youtube.com/watch?featur...85114404#t=492
dat silence