This sucka just said R Dizzle Jr is an action star....lol.
I love me some Robert Downy, but without that CGI he's no action star. Iron Man 1-Infinity is incredible, but he's no Arnold.
Statham basically does B movies and Liam Neeson only has one trilogy going for him. I like Taken (haven't seen 2 or 3), but they're not on the same level.
Movies suck now anyway. The only thing most of them are good for is material for RedLetterMedia to dump on.
NSFW
80's and 90's FTW
I'M GONNA' HAVE ME SOME FUN. I'M GONNA HAVE ME SOME FUN.
You should have put a trigger warning on that video, it was too much.
btw, fuck what anyone says... NL, I love you bro.
omg NL vs spicyryan and i missed it. GOD DAMN YOU WORLD
Jesus Christ, someone took a huge steaming fucking dump on this thread.
That's fine, and I see you're going through the thread from the beginning so you will notice I conceded that I shouldn't have called the guy an idiot, even if I firmly believe he is one. And I do have to do some more reading about MRAs, because I will admit that I may have been misled, my fault entirely for not doing my own research.
Fair point, but it is hard to ignore when it's directed at me and people like me, specifically. Currently, there are men (some even in this thread) who don't believe women have any agency or autonomy, and that's honestly terrifying.
The "friend zone" is a disgusting term men use to illustrate that they don't view women as anything but potential fucks, and when they don't get it, they act offended that they're in the "friend zone" rather than being glad to be in a friend relationship with someone. These men who complain about the friend zone seem to think that the only reason to talk to or be nice to a woman at all is to get into her pants, and then act like pissbabies when they don't get it. Guess what bro, women don't owe you shit for being nice.
You're doing a really good job of painting yourself as a royal misogynist, but it's cool, you're fucking annoying anyway so no big loss when I put you on ignore.
Took the words out of my mouth, honestly. And let's not forget that women fought for things, like the right to vote, like the right to work, like the right to equal pay, the right to a safe, harassment free workplace, and countless other things. We are still fighting for some things. Men didn't wake up one day and decide to give women anything. Women had to work for it, through grassroots efforts and campaigns. Men didn't make that decision just one day on a whim. Women stood up and made their voices heard. Ultimately, yes, men in power made the decision for women to have these rights, but they wouldn't have done so if women themselves hadn't mobilized.
Again, thank you. And you said it much better than I could have.
No one who is labeled as a SJW actually calls themselves that. That's a derogatory term that was given to them by others.
Actually, it's basically just an internet meme. Women use it all the time. The fact that you would turn it into something with deeper meaning against women just demonstrates how ridiculous and absurd feminists are. Most women wouldn't be supremely insulted by it.
Oh, wait, I forgot, I'm dealing with an internet SJW and their `look at me` vanity-raging.
Let me reiterate.
Most people wouldn't feign being supremely outraged by it.
When you say women, you mean trial lawyers, yes?Took the words out of my mouth, honestly. And let's not forget that women fought for things, like the right to vote, like the right to work, like the right to equal pay, the right to a safe, harassment free workplace, and countless other things. We are still fighting for some things. Men didn't wake up one day and decide to give women anything. Women had to work for it, through grassroots efforts and campaigns. Men didn't make that decision just one day on a whim. Women stood up and made their voices heard. Ultimately, yes, men in power made the decision for women to have these rights, but they wouldn't have done so if women themselves hadn't mobilized.
Women didn't "fight" for anything. I don't recall any battles in the streets. Society changed. That's it. You make it sound like everyone wearing a dress stormed the walls of Mordor. You also know a very ridiculous and PC version of history that doesn't actually reflect reality. You act like women triumphed over the evil man for the shift in society, which is a pile of fucking bullshit. Women in the workplace had plenty to do with necessity during WWII. You act like men fought tooth and nail against it and you overcame.
In Germany, for example, men were supporting women earning educations because they thought, by and large, it would make them better mothers. This wasn't a war in the streets between men and women to decide these things. This was just a change in society and a shift in cultural philosophy.
Sorry, but your fantasy about women "fighting the evil men to earn everything they have today" is pure fucking fiction and a laughable version of revisionist history.
Pre Women's `Liberation`:
Post Women's `Liberation`:
http://fotos.imegalodon.com/var/albu...g?m=1399834884
Hmmmmm….
Man, the sexism in the politics subofurm went from lukewarm to fever pitch.
I'm not sexist at all.
Who let NL out of the sprots forum, and who are these people responding to him?