Like didn't we have a whole conversation about why interstellar sucked? Or was that someone else?
Like didn't we have a whole conversation about why interstellar sucked? Or was that someone else?
Like, I can watch Macross any time I want and not have it have Matthew Mcoughney in it.
Like...if I wanted love transcending time and space...I have japan for that.
I went to interstellar for the science, and it dropped Anne Hathaway being a fucking tropey ass yandere and Matt Damon brawlin' in space in my lap. What do you want me to do with all this shit? Cuz I cant use it to build a good movie!
I'm with Sath, not a fan of Interstellar
I think Interstellar was astoundingly "ok"
I watched it once and felt entertained, but have zero desire to ever watch it again.
Oh jeeze all that Interstellar science. 3/4 of the movie was about calling your family on skype from space and crying.
My favorite part of interstellar was the mcconaughy reaction to the new star wars trailer lol
Fuck ya'll, interstellar was dope af, long live the mcconhaissance and Nolan = Goat.
Gravity was lame.Spoiler: show
nolan is prob the most overrated director working today
i fell asleep during interstellar
momento was rly good. inception was cool so was the magic movie with christian bale twins and wolverine featuring tesla but when that movie turned out to be hugh jackman killing tesla clones i was disappointed.
Memento is my #1 all time favorite. Inception is so godlike. Dark knight trilogy is dope af. Interstellar was dope too, but I agree the ending was kinda shitty (just that he survived), but the interactions it brings up w/ relativity is stuff I never really thought about so that was interesting.
Also, PRESTIGE WAS SO GOOD TOO. HOW IS NOLAN NOT GOAT.
THERE IS A BLACK KNIGHT TRILOGY?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...night_ver2.jpg
the world would never recover
The reason you never thought about it was that most of it is 100% horseshit.
Don't get me wrong, the first half of the movie has a lot of really decent and either spot-on or almost spot-on science. The second half of the movie has almost as much real science as a stargate SG-1 episode.
I don't think the movie has to be grounded in real science for it to be viewed as successful. It IS a movie after all.
Spoiler: show
I agree in general you are right. But when a movie advertises itself as something chock full o' realistic science, then I think it is ok to judge it as such.