it's 3% on 33 reviews or something atm
that is not a mean (beyond a silly 1 v 0 decimal transferred). RT simply marks if people rate it positive or negative, not a collation of assigned numerical values. MC takes the review values and averages them, RT simply tells you how many critics liked it. 3% of critics liked it, but the value critics gave to it average to 31. ergo it is not rated a 0 (in the aggregate), it is rated 31, which, of course, does not mean 31% of critics liked it (which is what a 31% at RT would indicate).
Bob Hoskins Mario has some redeeming qualities.
above or below a 31
I think it has like a 28 or 29 in RT, so...
It probably got some sympathy reviews upping its score down the line after Hoskins admitted both he and Leguizamo were completely smashed through the entire filming process because of how bad the movie was to make.
stop comparing RT scores to MC scores! they're measuring different things! what have we been talking about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
but nah yeah critics gave it a 35 at MC so indeed reception was kinder, thanks drunk Leguizamo
I know they're different things you jabroni, I was making a not so subtle jab at rhyis
nobody cares how these sites review their shit. i certainly don't
This is going to be on the FX channel before the end of the year guaranteed.
And sorry not to derail but when I looked at RT just now they have movies to watch for free and right at the top there is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and.. it's 77% and Certified Fresh. What. The. Fuck. ^^;
Sent from my Pixel 8 using Tapatalk
Wow I knew it was gonna be bad but not this bad
Oof. Per Variety:
Lionsgate’s video game adaptation “Borderlands” with Cate Blanchett, misfired with $8.8 million from 3,125 theaters to start. It landed in fourth place behind “Twisters,” which added $15.4 million from 3,664 locations in its fourth outing. Universal’s disaster epic has grossed $222 million domestically and $310 million worldwide.