NHL 15-16 Regular Season Thread: F I R E _ T H E R R I E N

[Richybear]

There was also a time when we didn't draft #1 overall. But I think that goes back to when a Pterodactyl was commish.

The funniest are hearing stories from old players like Guy Lafleur, who would smoke in the dressing room between periods (Not uncommon) but how he makes fun of today's game like "Now all players do is drink milk, and they even use a straw." LOL

[Ratatapa]

There was a time when Canadian teams could win the puck and didn't had to rely on the jets

[BadKarma]

Fun fact:

Lundqvist is 29-1-0 in his career against the Hurricanes

[BadKarma]

Two goals in eleven seconds lol

[Cail]

Sergei Federov night for Caps@Red Wings

[bori]

wow that was a terrible terrible terrible dive, sorry BK

[NynJa]

wow that was a terrible terrible terrible dive, sorry BK

Worse than Millers? Im at work so i cant see the dive youre talkin about

[Cail]

Williams is on the 3rd line tonight, Burakovsky's on the 2nd, Wilson is on the 4th

[bori]

Worse than Millers? Im at work so i cant see the dive youre talkin about

Girardi 'roughing' against Nordstrom. GIF hasn't popped up yet.

[Cail]

Cant tell, its inconclusive, but it was probably in

[Judai]

Refs checking to see if DET scored, called no goal on ice, play continued for 3m or so. On review no goal because you can't see the puck at all but I am 1000% sure it did and it's under Holtby's glove in the goal and he swats it out like a pro and keeps on going. Think we robbed them there.

[Cail]

Refs checking to see if DET scored, called no goal on ice, play continued for 3m or so. On review no goal because you can't see the puck at all but I am 1000% sure it did and it's under Holtby's glove in the goal and he swats it out like a pro and keeps on going. Think we robbed them there.

Finally, we got the good side of a bad call on a review

Edit: Er, wasnt a bad call. It was the right call. But yea, that was def in

[Judai]

Finally, we got the good side of a bad call on a review

I hear ya, though you can never actually see the puck, so nothing they can do. Pretty funny though. inc puck/goal line chips.

[bori]

I hear ya, though you can never actually see the puck, so nothing they can do. Pretty funny though. inc puck/goal line chips.

I often wonder how many situations of that nature were actually goals, by denied because it was inconclusive.

We need puck X-ray vision!!!

[BadKarma]

Worse than Millers? Im at work so i cant see the dive youre talkin about

Girardi 'roughing' against Nordstrom. GIF hasn't popped up yet.

https://twitter.com/ryanohan/status/664241831811661824

[bori]

https://twitter.com/ryanohan/status/664241831811661824

Rofl so bad

[Judai]

man, Ovi so many good shots and they just won't go in

[NynJa]

https://twitter.com/ryanohan/status/664241831811661824

Not worse than miller, but that should get a call from the league about embellishing.

[Judai]

Refs checking to see if DET scored, called no goal on ice, play continued for 3m or so. On review no goal because you can't see the puck at all but I am 1000% sure it did and it's under Holtby's glove in the goal and he swats it out like a pro and keeps on going. Think we robbed them there.

wat a cheater

[NynJa]

I wonder when the league is gonna implement a "defies the laws of physics" clause when determining goals like that.

Like the oilers goal against the kings...if the puck is in the glove, and the glove is clearly in the net, then the puck is in the net.