I don't think I've ever seen an eighth grader represent their school or grade level with "88" lol.
that star of david was actually a sheriffs badge you liberal numale cuck
Am I supposed to defend that or?
No, but your language implies that the victim or the crime here was somehow underplayed or ignored, and it's ridiculous.
I kinda understand where Day is coming off of on this one. It's pretty common to just see anything white on black labeled as a hate crime, while situations where the races are reversed it's just a incident. A conclusion that it literally took black people on tape shouting "Fuck white people" while accosting a white person to get a hate crime label.
https://twitter.com/APCentralRegion/...07897452433408
You're right it's ridiculous.
18 hours later they figure out "Fuck white people" means might have been racially motivated.
Did they upgrade to a hate crime charge because he's white or because he's handicapped?
i agree this can be the case in the realm of public opinion, but for actual investigative purposes it's entirely normal for law enforcement to hedge on hate crime motive in the initial days of investigation. motive is a very tricky thing to establish in court of law, making hate crime charges notoriously difficult to prosecute, and in this case the police were clearly hedging their bets as they had not even properly established the relationship between victim and assailants, and given the victim could give only an indistinct rendering of exactly what occurred given his handicap and his recently suffered trauma.
but naturally in this age of impatience all prosecutorial and investigative nuance gets more or less immediately discarded, and a hate crime charge that takes even one whole day to justify is seen as example of systemic bias.
I don't see the problem. Just beautiful equality amirite