Man that reminds me. The latest cumtown had a wonderful bit about how the question marks on The Riddlers outfit are for his gender and he traps batman by getting him to use the wrong pronoun.
Spends half the q&a trashing Trump. Very sad. Fake news everywhere.
I was gunna say there is something about his face that makes me want to punch it but then he came out in favor of memes and I now like this guy. Though his suggestion I read should read Locke or other actual serious political writers for each meme you use rustles my jimmies
Required listening for anyone that has ever even heard of Ben Shapiro https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qYp_6DcUzbU
I just watched a 2 hr vid I aint got time for another 30 minutes. Just give me a quick lit/unlit. Call it the litness test
some college kids making fun of ben's shitty book
How did you go from having a 5 minute commute to having time to listen to all the premium Cumtown and Chapos?
Spoiler: show
they are actually the highest earning patreon and bernie bros and probably your dream guys
http://www.newyorker.com/culture/per...e-dirtbag-left
didnt care for them, insisted upon themselves
I'm kicking you out of the DSA
https://psmag.com/on-the-milo-bus-wi...986#.4xofbkxo7
I found this to be an exceptional read.
It seems perfunctory to point out the hypocrisy of building a movement and a career on the back of insulting people — Muslims, migrants, women, people of color — while nursing a hair-trigger sensitivity to any personal attack you haven’t pre-approved. That hypocrisy, though, does not appear self-evident to anyone within this movement, because a fundamental tenet of far-right pro-trolling is that it’s only other people’s feelings that are frivolous. Their own feelings, by contrast, including the capacity to feel shame when they’re held accountable for their actions, are so momentous that infringing them is tantamount to censure, practically fascism in and of itself. These are men, in short, who have founded an entire movement on the basis of refusing to handle their emotions like adults.
That's a pretty solid article. It's a very slightly slanted in places but she makes really good points about who he surrounds himself with and why.
This is a very strong statement.Whether or not these kids deserve a second chance matters far less than whether the rest of us can afford not to give them one. There are millions of them, after all, and not all of them have the strength of character to recognize their wrongdoing and make amends. They are, however, coming to see their mistake. Some part of them believed that this was a game that would end when Trump became president. That was the big boss, the ultimate defeat of liberal social justice snowflakery. But guess what? You don’t get to check out at this level and quit the game and go back and cuddle your cat. Politics is a whole different kind of game, and the stakes are real, and there are no non-player characters.
Her prose waxes on at points, and it does come from its own certain vantage of privilege, but yes, lots of good stuff there
http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswit...terviews-still
What's in a name? A lot, according to a new study from researchers at Ryerson University and the University of Toronto. The study found that job applicants with Asian names — names of Indian, Pakistani or Chinese origin — were 28 percent less likely to get called for an interview compared to applicants with Anglo names, even when all the qualifications were the same. Researchers used data from a previous study conducted in 2011 where they sent out 12,910 fictitious resumes in response to 3,225 job postings. The previous study also found that applicants with Anglo first names and Asian last names didn't fare much better than applicants with Asian first and last names.
"Some people still believe that minorities have an advantage," said one of the study authors, Jeffrey Reitz, a sociologist at the University of Toronto. "These studies are important to challenge that and show that not only is this kind of discrimination happening, but it's quite systemic."
[....]
Discrimination of this sort often goes by unnoticed because statistics often portray Asian Americans as doing quite well — one of the best educated, highest income racial groups in the United States. But such statistics belie the fact that they're still not treated equally in comparison to their white counterparts. Reitz said that when researchers of the studies cited above asked employers to explain why they called fewer Asian applicants, they usually received a response along the lines of, "Well, you see an Asian name and you know that language problems are going to be there."
There's a part of me that's glad that people do this kinda research, but there's also a part of me that's cheesed off that these research groups are sending out thousands of fake resumes that may prevent lesser qualified, but still qualified people from getting call backs.