PC Principal thread

[NynJa]

He is mayad cause they weren't instantly thrown in prison but racist who lost their jobs were fired! Come on don't you see the intolerance and how people are scared of being Islamophobic?

This is strawman, because I never said anything about prison. Salodin made the first comments about prison, and I deflected to job security because I wasnt talking about prison. Idiot.

Actually taking pictures of children without a reason is illegal since they can't give consent homie. There's a media release waiver parents have to sign yearly and that waiver can be revoked at anytime...

"It was for the yearbook".

That's bullshit that only Islamic practicing men had child rape cases covered up to avoid being considered Racist or Islamophobic. The catholic church has been doing it for years? Christians around America as well. There are perverts of every religion and color. Child rape should not be a who does it more, it's all equally bad and should be brought to light.

Just curious, but do you practice Islam? I know this is leaning to personal shit (but hey, all you've resorted to is "you so mayad" "wipipo so opresso" and other idiotic shit with zero substance), but your posterior is incredibly sore about what I initially posted. You had gone dark for about 6 months, only to resurface when Panda made a comment about a lack of public hair signifying pre-pubescence (probably because the concept of pubes = looking younger offended you, but who am I to judge), and now you're literally guns blazing. So I clearly offended you really really hard with my initial comments about this, and somehow you're even more sore about Karb's post.

No where in my original post did I mention anything about them being Muslim or anything like that. Nowhere in my second post did I mention about them being Muslim either, other than the fact they were sharing ISIS Propaganda.

Show us on the doll where your feefee's got hurt.

[NynJa]

They should be put on administrative leave while an investigation takes place. Maybe I misread the article, but didn't the same happen to the people in question?

Oh hey, now you agree with what I was initially posting about and why I was flipping my shit.

The reports claimed at least one employee had security clearance that allowed the individual to be on the tarmac. Two of the four employees still work at the airport but have been reassigned. Two other employees had their security cards confiscated because authorities were concerned over their mental well-being.

Theyre not on administrative leave. The articles are kinda vague on what they do, but they're still working at the airport.

The report suggests the employees either don’t work for the airport anymore or have been reassigned to positions far from the runway and airplanes.

The fact that its vague is already worrisome. Its like they had multiple people addressing the media and they gave conflicting stories. So they could have gone from working security at the doors to limit access to the runways to working security at checkpoint. Who knows? What is known is they're still presently working there.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_103
This is an actual thing in Canada, which makes no sense because we already have hate speech laws (which I've already covered) that cover this very thing.

[thetruepandagod]

woops.

[Zetanio]

Nynja, you better stop with the anti-Muslim bullying. You're gonna end up getting fired.

[Milkster]

This is strawman, because I never said anything about prison. Salodin made the first comments about prison, and I deflected to job security because I wasnt talking about prison. Idiot.



"It was for the yearbook".



Just curious, but do you practice Islam? I know this is leaning to personal shit (but hey, all you've resorted to is "you so mayad" "wipipo so opresso" and other idiotic shit with zero substance), but your posterior is incredibly sore about what I initially posted. You had gone dark for about 6 months, only to resurface when Panda made a comment about a lack of public hair signifying pre-pubescence (probably because the concept of pubes = looking younger offended you, but who am I to judge), and now you're literally guns blazing. So I clearly offended you really really hard with my initial comments about this, and somehow you're even more sore about Karb's post.

No where in my original post did I mention anything about them being Muslim or anything like that. Nowhere in my second post did I mention about them being Muslim either, other than the fact they were sharing ISIS Propaganda.

Show us on the doll where your feefee's got hurt.

Disagreeing with people means your feels got hurt. It's still 07 and people are using that as a tactic huh. Me calling you an idiot doesn't detract from the fact that you are infact, an idiot with a horribly flawed, "Well if xxx did so and so this would have happened to them!" post. If you'll check who the Islamophobia and the Muslim child rape thing was directed at maybe it would make more sense cause I definitely did not reply to you with that comment and it wasn't about the airport workers, so idk what you're trying to do there.

The yearbook thing, you just changed your position. Not having a reason of taking pictures of children is different than saying I'm taking random pictures of kids doing shit for the yearbook. There are "goofy" sections in the yearbook. No how do how your yearbooks work up north but there have been pictures of kids sleeping for a certain teacher's page or other weird stuff. It's up to whoever produces and edits the year to take it up with the proper authorities if there is something that can be considered as abuse. And if you're saying people would say they're taking inappropriate pictures of children for the yearbook but just lining their personal stash of child porn, they would have to first have suspicion and/or be caught in the act before anything such as an investigation could be done. Then it is up to the person who witnessed the crime to come forward before the investigation can begin. And teachers are definitely being suspended left and right just for being accused and until the investigations or court cases clear them of any wrong doing.

That's the end goal, you want them in prison and for them to lose their jobs. What do you think the purpose of the investigation was for? You also don't know what they are currently doing at the airport since you said it yourself, the article you posted wasn't clear. Sweaty, do better. (:

I was gone longer than 8 months and I'm still not that interested in this forum. I was bored and most of the Trump supporters have blocked me on Facebook for dragging them daily. I had some down time.

[dasva]

Um with their security cards revoked doesn't effectively make them on paid leave except they still have to show up? I mean can they do anything that matters right now?

[tyven]

Um with their security cards revoked doesn't effectively make them on paid leave except they still have to show up? I mean can they do anything that matters right now?

sit in the cafeteria and fuckin praise allah

[Milkster]

Why would anyone want to keep those under investigation somewhere you could keep track off them like work until they get charged. Cause they definitely aren't flight risks if they were to be fired or anything.

[NynJa]

Um with their security cards revoked doesn't effectively make them on paid leave except they still have to show up? I mean can they do anything that matters right now?

Not necessarily
The articles are vague, and all 3 articles give conflicting information. They could have gone from working international checkpoint to working domestic checkpoint.

[Karbuncle]

That's bullshit that only Islamic practicing men had child rape cases covered up to avoid being considered Racist or Islamophobic. The catholic church has been doing it for years? Christians around America as well. There are perverts of every religion and color. Child rape should not be a who does it more, it's all equally bad and should be brought to light.

Not the same. With the church, once it came to light got lit the fuck up and those involved punished (though I would argue more deserved punishment), once the world knew and police were involved there was at least some justice given.

The issue isn't that "they're doing it", I know perversion isn't race reliant, it's that it's known that it's going on and being ignored and allowed to happen, worst still excuses being made to make it "legal" or a non-issue because the department doesn't want to appear racist.

I agree it's all bad but this isn't about being brought to light. It's in the light, and they're letting it happen out of fear of backlash from SJ calling them islamaphobes and racists for targeting these men. I know you can see that's fucked up, I'm not saying you can't, I'm pointing out this is where we stand right now in some countries, and it's awful.

So it's no surprise to me he's keeping his job. Still to Nynja I agree I think he should lose his job or at the very least be out on paid leave while a full investigation is underway, he should not be at the airport.

[NynJa]

That's the end goal, you want them in prison and for them to lose their jobs.

You mean I'm a bad person for thinking that someone who is a risk of having becoming radicalized, who is sharing ISIS propaganda, who is researching how to build home made bombs, who is making encouraging comments towards the Paris bombings and other ISIS beheadings is unfit to work as airport security, with the prospect of being thrown in prison if they have indeed become radicalized?!?

If thats wrong and makes me a bad person, I feel really really fucking bad for the people who are right, like you.

[Karbuncle]

You mean I'm a bad person for thinking that someone who is a risk of having becoming radicalized, who is sharing ISIS propaganda, who is researching how to build home made bombs, who is making encouraging comments towards the Paris bombings and other ISIS beheadings is unfit to work as airport security, with the prospect of being thrown in prison if they have indeed become radicalized?!?

If thats wrong and makes me a bad person, I feel really really fucking bad for the people who are right, like you.

You Trumpet racist you!

[dasva]

Not necessarily
The articles are vague, and all 3 articles give conflicting information. They could have gone from working international checkpoint to working domestic checkpoint.

Somehow I'd doubt that but I'd think we'd need more solid information before throwing bs on this

[dasva]

sit in the cafeteria and fuckin praise allah

They getting paid to pray!?! This better not be reflected on my airfare!

[Karbuncle]

They getting paid to pray!?! This better not be reflected on my airfare!

I know you're being sarcastic and idiots like that exist, but if you can't see the difference between complaining about someone who's legitimately showing warning signs of radicalization and someone who's just practicing their religion, you're empowering the person you're mocking here because if this guy does do something, it'll just be a huge rallying cry for them, especially with the information known.

Again I'm not saying throw him in jail but a suspension should be reasonable while he's investigated.

[NynJa]

Somehow I'd doubt that but I'd think we'd need more solid information before throwing bs on this

This is a message board for discussion, not the court of law.

Unless that changed at some point?

[Salodin]

What is supposed to happen is happening, and the lack of information as to their current job situation has you thinking they're getting paid to scope out their next target. Would you be satisfied if a picture was posted of them living in a cardboard box while the investigation took place? I don't know how they do it in Canada, but I'm pretty sure it's not how you want it to be lol.

[dasva]

This is a message board for discussion, not the court of law.

Unless that changed at some point?

Yes you can state whatever opinion you want but by the same token people gunna call you out for it. Now if we were discussing what ifs....

[Milkster]

You mean I'm a bad person for thinking that someone who is a risk of having becoming radicalized, who is sharing ISIS propaganda, who is researching how to build home made bombs, who is making encouraging comments towards the Paris bombings and other ISIS beheadings is unfit to work as airport security, with the prospect of being thrown in prison if they have indeed become radicalized?!?

If thats wrong and makes me a bad person, I feel really really fucking bad for the people who are right, like you.

You said you didn't bring up prison, your endgoal and the way you're speaking is with prison immediately after this all happened sans the investigation. You're posting that you're upset because he wasn't immediately fired (and arrested). That's what I meant by your end goal is prison and being fired. You wanted to skip the investigation and everything that happened in the middle. No one is saying he shouldn't go to prison if he's found guilty derpderp but there is a process. Do you fuck up your investigation by arresting them too early? Exactly.

[dasva]

I know you're being sarcastic and idiots like that exist, but if you can't see the difference between complaining about someone who's legitimately showing warning signs of radicalization and someone who's just practicing their religion, you're empowering the person you're mocking here because if this guy does do something, it'll just be a huge rallying cry for them, especially with the information known.

Again I'm not saying throw him in jail but a suspension should be reasonable while he's investigated.

Oh I was just joking back with Tyven there not mocking anyone really. Serious talk though do that shit on your break. Also related smokers get way to many fucking breaks!!!

I'm not saying a suspension couldn't work I'm just saying from what it says it sounds like they've taken measures that are as effective from a security standpoint as that without giving them a free vacation and allowing them to keep an eye on them they just look worse especially since it's somewhat vague and laws/rules differ in different areas