Unless you're trying to breed out sickle cell or Tay-Sachs it doesn't really matter.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Unless you're trying to breed out sickle cell or Tay-Sachs it doesn't really matter.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
In that matter it wasn't just the British line that was heavily inbred but the thought at the time was that blood purity was what defined royalty. Introducing dirty peasant blood would diminish the power of authority of their control of the land and a social abhorrence. Aristocracy within a circle of a few hundred families over the course of 20 generations quickly leads to inbred-as-fuck status.
Prince Harry prolly looks so good since he's the bastard child of diana's fling.
But ya, I imagine it's quite hard for the average person to be as incestuous as any bloodpure royal family, and even fuckin ur own daughters and various other family took generations to show up physically. The sooner worry was joffrey unhinged types.
Mixed race people are pretty attractive though.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Not always...
![]()
Only fairly close inbreeding is really harmful. Otherwise not really for individuals and quite possible the opposite. There is a reason why certain traits became more prevalent in certain regions though that is becoming less and less important. But as a species yeah genetic diversity is the shit
It's honestly like they want the entire world on /pol/ at this point.
http://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-...-you-1-5006102
Also kekIn my first five minutes on 4chan I saw some pictures I cannot now un-see (one of which literally did give me a nightmare a couple of nights later) so be warned, if you’re curious enough to visit for yourself. It is as uncensored a place as you’ll find this side of the Dark Web.
It's like people can't believe that there isn't a single ideological stance on 4chan.But there are some signs of opposition creeping in on the site itself. During my research I was struck by the amount of counter-harassment I saw from a more ‘liberal’ perspective.
You mean a site where people can post anything anonymously doesn't lead to everyone agreeing over everything?
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
what? here, let me quote it again for you:
individual is the key word here. im saying a world where absolutely every individual was the same would be pretty damn boring, as much as a salad made up of nothing but iceberg lettuce and nothing else would be. im not advocating for distinct cultural heretige at all - mix away, because combining old traditions with other ones is how we come up with exciting new things like texmex, gumbo, or other fascinating cultural mixes. such mixes eventually become their own distinct cultures. that's the thing about culture - it's not a bunch of rocks, they're living creatures that breed and make new culture-babies that grow up and become their own thing.
i'm sorry if you somehow misunderstood my point, but im saying people shouldn't be carbon copies of each other, regardless of what color or heritage said copy is. each individual should be cherished as the distinct thing they are, but with everyone connected together. that's the true symbolism of the rainbow the LGBT community uses- every individual their own distinct color, but everyone bound together as a single whole.
You suck at explaining things.
Wait did they call 4chan a part of the dark web.
Wut?
Go fuck yourself.
My LA City Council race just heated up.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/edito...427-story.html
Tl;dr The young fresh faced insurgent candidate's Voat posting history was found.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Voat's wikipedia article is a trip.
I, too, take serious the opinions of someone who is likely not going to generate offspring on race mixing.
I feel like tacos.