Best point in this thread tbh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Best point in this thread tbh
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
time to build that wall
Let it go Day, you said he wasn't a nazi and someone had to give the dude more hits to give you proof that the dude in fact deserved to get punched.
If you require proof before you decide on a person's character, that's cool, but don't turn around and bitch afterwards that we had to provide said proof for you to believe us. That's on you homey.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
I'm not sure that anyone deserves to suffer physical violence because of their political or religious beliefs.
I've seen Spencer classified as a White Supremacist, not sure if that's automatically the same thing as a Nazi.
Kind of like how all Jacuzzis are tubs but not all tubs are Jacuzzis.
He must secure the existence of his people and a future for white children, would people care if that was a brown person saying the brown equivalent of that?
just asking for a NAZI friend
lol at the gym being racist.
You think people are being extreme, but then you make extreme statements. You sincerly can't fathom a reason to justify physical violence against a person for their political or religious beliefs?
Well, from that statement alone no. I'm sure if you add context though you'll come to a logical conclusion.
Or you could not, and assume people are beating up on another innocent white man.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
I just asked you the question to your statement of "I'm not sure anyone deserves to suffer...political views, etc".
I disagree.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
That's well within your right. I'm not here to change your mind.... or punch you in the face for disagreeing with me.
It dawns on me that I didn't actually answer your question. I usually have problems finding the words to explain myself clearly so I'll try to keep it short and sweet.
I have yet to hear of a situation where someone has said something that I disagree with so vehemently that I thought they deserved to be punched in the face. If you let someone anger you to the point that you lose it, they've won and have gotten exactly what they wanted and they are likely going to garner support as the victim.
I'll punch you in the face if that's what you're into.
Our penal codes are set up to provide disincentives for antisocial behaviors (like violence).
Although there might be some correlations, our penal codes are not set up to define ethical behavior. You can break the law while acting ethically. In fact, there may be times when another person is behaving legally, but unethically, and someone else could behave ethically, but illegally, to correct it. (Ex. punching racists) If you're willing to do the time, then go ahead and do the crime. Jury nullification exists for a reason, so if your jury of neighbors agrees with your reasoning then they can acquit you even if they think you're guilty.
If society thinks that a certain type of unacceptable vigilante justice is becoming too common (Ex. lynchings, systematic disenfranchisement, taking a racist's gym membership, etc.), then it's free to create more laws or change how the laws are enforced to correct it. The bitchy back and forth debate of the last few pages is a small portion of society (BG) coming to grips with the most recent incarnation of vigilante justice and deciding whether action should be taken.
I vote no, because fuck this guy. I hope he ends up in federal pound me in the ass prison.
PS. I guess safe spacers should start having meetings at the gym because apparently conservatives agree that should be a safe space for all ideologies. >^,^<
Bro.
World War II.
What the fuck. We literally culled a not insignificant portion of the world population on nothing more than political beliefs. Jesus fucking Christ it's like we refuse to pay attention to history. And in the context of a man who supports most if not all of the same ideologies of those very people from that conflict.
But yeah, no one deserves physical harm over their views.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
I'm with you for the most part but I'd argue that their actions are what sparked us to murderball them. If they had just espoused all these views and never actually done anything, we wouldn't have had to go over and kick them in the teeth.
Well views are not actions. Fighting fire with fire would mean fighting those views with one's of your own. And if they turn to action to respond in kind.
If you gonna equate this moron to literal holocaust I'm not really sure you have a gripl on reality but ill start equating all of socialism to the maoist purges
Can i start punching brown people yet?
FUCKING NAZIS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I can see why people feel political beliefs aren't enough, since our political apparatus sometimes appears to be nothing but hot air, but politics turns into policies that turn into shoving people in an oven and offing them as systematically as cattle.
Just because these supremacists have a hard time enacting their agenda doesn't mean we act like they arent trying. When they aren't actively trying to keep down everyone else they're training the next generation to follow in their steps. We are literally talking about the political descendants of some of the worst people in modern history, I give them no benefit of the doubt.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Also, if were gonna equate punches to murder, then I can equate white supremacist to Nazis.
Or, we can be happy this nazi had a rough day, got punched at some point, and now has to spend some time away from nazi camp to find a new gym. I have no sympathy for him.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk