You know what else prompts people jumping on you on twitter? Anything. Welcome to the internet; grow a thicker skin, or hide in your safe space.
You know what else prompts people jumping on you on twitter? Anything. Welcome to the internet; grow a thicker skin, or hide in your safe space.
the blame rests with them, sure.. but that's not what blubb was getting at afaik
she can't control what they say... but she can control how much she's hurt by their messages. She's only a little bit better than they are by deleting her account and doing the ultimate "walking away" strat vs bullying, but she could have taken the even higher road and realized what she said had nothing wrong with it and just kept on keepin on
To willingly ascribe to victim-hood just because the blame lies with the other party is a kind of woe-is-me style masochism
Tbh she also could have just shut the fuck up from the get go. I'd have to imagine I'm not alone in never thinking to myself "Man I wonder what Daisy Ridley's opinion on gun violence is, hopefully she addresses this at some awards show"
I get that actors wanting to look all caring and culturally sensitive at awards show is a thing, but does most of the world actually give a shit what they think?
I don't give a shit about her opinion either, which is why I don't go looking for it on fucking instagram and lose my shit when she makes an extremely benign comment.
You might as well say "who cares about any random persons opinion about anything, we should all just stop talking about things."
...or, just learn how to deal with a person's opinions without getting all defensive and aggressive.
People need to stop acting as if gun violence is only a thing here in North America. I don't see anything wrong with this actress showing empathy towards the loss of life. Was it the right place for it? Probably not. Just like the rant a few years ago by that woman from medium going on about the wage gap during an award acceptance speech.
It does wreak a bit of virtue signalling to me. I find it a little sad people would seek her out to express their disdain in her statements though. Why bother?
Remember, it's the PC people that are so fucking sensitive about everything but a person expressing sympathy for victims of gun violence apparently triggered enough pathetic jackoffs to flood the interwebs with flaccid rage.
Oh, I was a little confused. I thought she made some comments on the awards show. Was it only something that happened on instagram during the awards show? The article didn't seem to clarify it for me when I read it a second time.
It was a picture of her at an awards show with the associated comments.
It was the Teen Choice awards, which had a big segment in the awards show itself about victims of gun violence.
To be fair, as the new face of Star Wars she should have known better then to make polarizing comments.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
At its most polarizing, that post has a negative take on gun violence only by proxy, due to support of gun violence victims. Does anyone support gun violence? How is that remotely polarizing?Originally Posted by Daisy Ridley
I lean towards whatever side supports the free, productive exchange of ideas. In this case, it's not the random trolls of Instagram.
Trolls of instagram is never a phrase I thought we would come to. Harassment through a medium with probably the worst commenting system known to modern social media.
What a world.
and thus the triggerers became the triggered. and God looked down upon it, and He saw that it was good.
I like that multiple people keep trying to preach this narrative that "oh my the hypocrisy, triggerers becoming triggered and whatnot" as if they had never fucking heard of the concept of trolling.