If they banned assault rifles you'd be perfectly fine hunting with shotguns and rifles. It'd be much harder to get a high score with those same guns or a pistol though. Not impossible, but harder. And that's all that's being asked for, to make it harder.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Hey lets not forget about all the people killed by guns while not in school.
How would you have touching family moments like your daughter's first shotgun if there was a restriction on possessing long guns?
Even then there was only half of the amount of flip from Bernie to Trump as there were Hillary to McCain in 2008 and "Hillary Or Busters" weren't nearly as vilified if vilified at all. The whole dialogue of Bernie Bros handing Trump the election is a false one. People who don't normally vote came out for Trump this last election.
Gun if she wants one is the infinitely better purchase
Honestly the gun holds its value better then the phone. You can't argue that logic.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Because a few bad apples ruined it for you.
And because you have alternatives to do the hobbies you say you want an AR for. You don't need an AR to enjoy hunting, in many cases it's not desirable even. So why should their concerns hold weight when getting a high score in a mass shooting necessitates a weapon we would consider an AR?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Like, is the question why shouldn't hunters be allowed to own ARs, or is it why do hunters need ARs? You can hunt without ARs, so why do hunters care?
Or is it because using ARs is fun? Because if that's the only reason then I'm sorry, I'm willing to regulate or deny that fun if it means an even small reduction in the number of mass shootings, and/or a reduction in the number of deaths resulting from a mass shooting.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Alcohol is not guns. Alcohol can't be bought by an 18 year old and then used to kill 17 people in a school. You can compare them all you want, but one is demonstratebly more dangerous then the other. Maybe in the future when the culture has changed and we can allow the ownership of weapons without them being used in dozens of shootings a month then sure, we can relax restrictions. But now? They're literally easier to get then alcohol, and whose only purpose is to kill a living thing. Beer isn't designed to do that, ARs are.
Pretty sure I heard that NRA lady keep repeating self defense, like it couldn't be accomplished without assault rifles.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Im a good guy, i have no convictions, i haven't gotten into an accident or been pulled over in a decade.
I should be able to drive as fast as i want, buy and do drugs, and whatever else i want because im a good guy.
Fuck this NRA spokesperson Dana Bitchface.
No you wouldn't, because all evidence illustrates that it would saves lives yet it seems you aren't in favor of it. None of those items listed were designed to kill people, and then used to do that in a school. That seems like a pretty important distinction.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Lastly, guns are for fucking pussies.