depends. is someone just beating me with the protractor? meh. or are they using it in... other ways? then I might agree with you![]()
depends. is someone just beating me with the protractor? meh. or are they using it in... other ways? then I might agree with you![]()
I have a metal one from my art days. It's pretty much an unsharpened bladed boomerang. So, I'd understand the ban.
I still don't understand the legitimate use case for a suppressor.
So they can murder more liberal kids before tripping the alarm, duh.
Its ear protection more than anything. They arent like the movies dudes.
Guns are loud and can cause permanent hearing damage, wearing range ear protection isn't always feasible but on the other hand fuck the NRA because they're cunty shitbags.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
At least you're honest that's all we can ask for.
Not to mention don't suppressors mess with aim on pistols fairly bad, due to the extra length in the barrel?
Theres actually a supposed 1-3% increase in velocity due to the longer barrel. The suppressor doesnt hinder anything.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/201...of-the-bullet/
i can't aim with handguns for shit but have noticed minimal if any effect on accuracy from a silencer. modern suppressors do not contact the bullet in flight or impact velocity in any way. and they do reduce recoil and sound (surprise) so can actually help with accuracy if those are impacting the shooter's aim.
That in itself is it's own can of worms. Some jurisdictions don't even allow tasers. Pepper spray you have to be up close to the target, within arms reach as the spray doesn't have much of a range, so that won't do you any good against a gun man unless you get the drop on them. At least the agency I worked for required yearly certification and training for each individual less than lethal weapon. So good luck getting the state to pay teachers for that.
Are those restrictions and certifications any more strict than guns? I can't imagine that they would require more training or be more strict. They are already talking about arming teachers with guns. It would seem to me that arming them with less than lethal alternatives to start would be a cheaper experiment.
Also they do make higher pressure longer range pepper spray cans. Certainly I would imagine good enough for the close quarters of a school with classrooms and hallways.