And honestly, it's not really the average joe's fault that school funding is so low. We have levies and such frequently here on our voting block, but the most significant blow to my town's schooling was the closure of a power plant years back, which contributed a fair deal of money for operating within such close proximity. Otherwise, we're not exactly swimming in rich people to more heavily tax because this is a shithole no one of means actually wants to live in if they can avoid it. Expanding such more to the federal level would help, but otherwise we're largely at the mercy of what the city/county generates.
The argument those who feel making our schools more prison-like isn't the solution lies largely in the fact that school shootings were largely unheard of until Columbine. So, what has changed between the past and present leading to this more significant threat?
On one hand, you have the continued creation and advancement of firearms with destruction or loss not keeping up. Thinking back to the 70's, it's most likely what a gun owning civilian had in their house would've been a revolver and/or shotgun. Both are not conducive to mass murder. Nowadays? You've got clip-based weaponry in both pistol and rifle form that can spew lots more death in a minute. We're supposed to believe we need these things because one day the government could turn on us, but in comparison to what they have at their disposal, we're fucked if that's ever actually the case. Such things also aren't needed for hunting, leaving "practical use" more for entertainment purposes. Which really just translates to some guy's belief of fun trumping the safety of kids.
On the other side of the equation, there is the matter of why kids lash out. Over-medication and/or misdiagnosis of mental issues? Bullying, both physical and cyber? Loss of parental interaction due to the ever-increasing workforce demands? School classes/programs being cut? Sexuality/identity issues? It's not wrong to say things like these are contributing factors, but they're also not what is literally killing people like guns are. Rather, they're reasons why people are more likely to turn to such an easy means of retribution. It's not like it isn't known guns are more likely to empower people toward violence compared to knives or other weapons. And in some cases, this comes off more as a glorified suicide by cop where the argument could've been made they would've just offed themselves instead of taking people with them, too. And certainly, suicide is its own can of worms that share the above reasons, but there's also a difference in making the choice to take your own life and to make that for others. Putting such power in the hands of the unstable is a problem, and further why parts of the conversation do involve psychological checks and revocations if certain acts are committed like domestic violence.
XI Wiki



