Obviously Gawker is going to be biased toward their own side, but if most of the stuff in that article is factually true, what a sham of a trial. There's no way $140mil stands on appeal, and I wouldn't be surprised if it gets thrown out entirely.
I read they can't appeal until they pay 50mil or something like that. No idea if that's factual.
Thats what I've heard Dantrag. That in Florida they'd have to deposit the required amount (Capping at $50m), plus two years interest into an escrow account.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/25/bu...wker.html?_r=0
Turns out Hulk Hogan had a financial backer. Peter Thiel wanted some revenge from gawker for outing him back in 2007.
lol ...and they began to suspect someone vindictive was involved when Hogan's lawyers dropped the only charge Gawker was actually insured against.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanmac/.../#31718f257805
The guy is also a libertarian and a support of Donald Trump, if that matters to you at all.If Gawker fails in its appeal in Hogan’s first case, it may not be around much longer to explore that new focus. On top of the $140 million in total damages facing Gawker, the company has already likely accumulated millions of dollars in legal fees defending itself. Lawsuits like these can have a chilling effect on the rest of the media industry, said First Amendment expert Peter Scheer, as they may encourage other wealthy individuals to back litigation against media companies that run unflattering stories about them.
“That’s often the purpose of these cases,” said Scheer, the director of the First Amendment Coalition. “Winning is the ultimate chilling effect, but if you can’t win the case, you at least want the editors to think twice before writing another critical story about you.”
Scheer, who has followed the Gawker situation closely but was unaware of a relationship between Thiel, Harder and Hogan, said he expects to see more lawsuits like this one to be brought against other media organizations: “It’s more common today than it has ever been, because there are more private individuals with enough unrestricted cash to be able to do that.”
Lol "unflattering" stories. Yeah that's what this is about
Thiel confirmed for buttblasted gamergater
Skimmed the original article that outed him on Gawker. This comment from Denton on the article is telling in hindsight:
I guess Thiel made good on that promise.If Silicon Valley is the bastion of tolerance it likes to believe, and if the tech industry cares only about money, it's surprising that Thiel would have kept his personal life a secret from journalists and his closest colleagues, for so long. He was so paranoid that, when I was looking into the story, a year ago, I got a series of messages relaying the destruction that would rain down on me, and various innocent civilians caught in the crossfire, if a story ever ran.
Let's just hope that other rich people don't take this as a model for how to get back at unfavorable press coverage.
http://www.vox.com/2016/5/26/1177285...iel-gawker-war
This was my largest concern about the trial.
i cant wait until president trump learns from this and the only news organization letft in the country is breitbart.
Eh the case is completely legitimate and might not have really gone this far without help.
Also lol at Mother Jones. Who the hell spends $2.5 million in legal fees fighting a $75k lawsuit?
If money was no object for me, I was a vindictive dickhead who refuses to lose, and felt like I could win the case, I probably would.
That makes it a perfect example - rich person bleeding a media company of cash because they didn't like what said company reported, puts them in a no-win situation even if the case is without merit.