I can see it's a problem. I was responding to the article you linked which purported that the google searches were being done by people who had voted to leave and I gave a reason why it might not be them (or at least some of them). It could be children who weren't able to vote, looking up why we're bringing the apocalypse down upon them, who knows.
So that infers that anyone who voted to leave are obviously oafs, barely educated, don't know what they're doing etc. Let's watch the world burn, after all, there aren't any smart people left to follow it through.
Oh jeez, I'm just thinking about what will happen when Trump is voted in. Oh the fun we'll have then.
this dogpiling is hilarious. She voted the way she wanted. If you don't like that, maybe instead of calling her a racist or being a cockgobbler you can argue actual ideas.
People not voting due to laziness/apathy/ignorance isn't her or anyone elses problem. Find the fucks who didn't vote and bitch at them. Oh and Laugana, ignore Bum. He's our resident race-baiter
Agree with Koul and I'm liberal / generally on the remain side. You can't be liberal and bemoan the most fundamental aspect of democracy, nor can this referendum be distilled into sane and good people vs xenophobic racists.
And this was a pretty great comment I just saw on Deadspin:
Originally Posted by Deadspin
Ugh. I need a good video to sort through this. BG help!!!
I'm confused myself. Nothing she said was really laughable imo. So, you're saying that those top search results are directly and absolutely from everyone who voted to leave/regret their vote. Wut. Even if that's the case, looks like they gotta deal with the punishment of their decision. No point complaining about it or harping on someone that doesn't regret their decision.
The laughable part is
a. claiming this is fearmongering, when showing a lack of education on such an important topic is not fearmongering no matter who it was in the UK searching.
and b. the hypocrisy over me implying uneducated people after she generalized and said it was probably dimwits. (Which is why I implied uneducated in the first place.)
You do realize I haven't said anything on this topic until I posted the article, right? I am not really some kind of big complainer over here. Posting articles is now complaining?
My only concern about this whole thing is how it will affect US economy and world relations.
Are we talking US liberals here? Because if so, that statement is kinda disingenuous.
Liberals (well, democrats) today are about big government and a republic structure of voting for reps to vote for them. Hell, even our presidential nominee process is using the republic structure rather than straight democracy.
This is not to say that liberals can't love democracy as that is a part of having a republic. Just that it's not a contradiction to be a liberal and "bemoan" this decision.
Wow Cameron better go live under a rock, is incredible how 1 person can gamble and his result become a disaster for a whole continent. You guys in europe better change your money into bitcoins, gold, usd, etc. I see pound and euro crashing a loooot more in next months.
Actually is there a possibility in a few years british vote again for joining the EU? i mean short time new election like 2-3 years.
I'm sympathetic to your argument, and part of the problem is that many of the elites aren't sufficiently in-touch to the needs of the general populace on these matters, but another part is that demagogues are willing to sell the people false promises in order to take advantage of their anger. I mean, Nigel Farage already reneged on the promise that leaving would put more money into health care, and it's barely a day after the vote happened. That doesn't seem like an auspicious start to this new path.
I recall someone (elsewhere, I think twitter, or a chat I frequent) said there's no takesies-backsies on this. Once you're out, you're out.
Unsure of how true that is, though.