Just so we're clear:
FBI sends out a vague letter in no way stating that they're investigating Hillary, it means she's absolutely losing this election and going to jail.
Trump has an email server with the sole function of communicating with Russia, and it's all good, nothing to see here.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Corruption and lies are fine as long as your party is the one doing it, same arguments from both sides of the aisle, no matter what country you're in, it's impossible to change people minds in almost 100% of cases, which is why Politics is one of the three things you don't discuss in polite company, money politics and religion, all they do is lead to fights and headaches.
Gred honestly has the right way of thinking, even though he goes about it in a slightly smug manner
Ignore the minor bullshit on both sides, sit as close to the middle of the aisle as you comfortably can, and vote for the policies that allign closest to the issues at or near the top of your list.
Everything gets a lot simpler if you mentally remove the candidates themselves and just look at their Policies.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/14/e-...etary-clinton/
something fishy with that whole thing, even the article you linked doesn't sound very good IMO
If independent researchers could easily make these connections and monitor from afar, you'd have to imagine that the NSA, CIA, FBI, etc would've caught wind of this and have been actively monitoring and/or investigating quietly themselves, right? You don't really buy into this muhh putin stuff, right? I don't think there's enough hands on the earth to grasp the straws that wildly speculative article with reddit posts for sources has put out.
I didn't say it was a total fabrication of the facts. And the article even states:
Just want to make sure we're all on the same page. A lot of lies being planted inside truths lately. But thanks for playing.Trump is certainly within his right to question the indisputable links between Clinton Foundation donors and their ties to Uranium One, but Trump’s charge exaggerates the links. More importantly, his suggestion of a quid pro quo is unsubstantiated, as Schweizer the author of Clinton Cash himself has admitted.
Malik Obama doing an AMA right now.
I'm sure Zoner will fill us in so we don't have to watch.
Thanks for playing what? I'm just pointing out new info that came out since that politico article was written that conflicts with some of the things in it. That whole thing doesn't smell right, but I guess I'm just "playing" instead of trying to discuss it. Getting a bit hostile in here today.
In my opinion this is what the big hoopla Comey and Co are looking into, I could be wrong, I try to preface everything correctly so I don't get beaten over the head.
It was an offhand comment. Didn't mean to piss you off.
Bernillary Clanders.. damn..
Lmfao.
Malik is a 10/10 shitposter.
Paul Manafort chaired the Trump campaign, a man with known ties to Putin and took millions of dollars from Russian in relation to Crimea. But it's somehow absurd that there's a connection between the Trump campaign and Russian finance? Yeah, ok. Color me shocked.
That is a good question. Possibly related:
from this piece: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...m-company.htmlAs the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.