They are quite literally the same comparisons I used before. And I don't care for your contextual argument which is why I ignored it. I'm saying this is why people might think there is a bias.
Or because they flat out disagree with the reasons for the answer like:
And as far as this one I don't know if she actually referenced refugees at large or syrian refugees in her speech.
But I do know that even politifact agrees with her if she was referencing the migrant wave and not just syrians.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...sis-men-213500
But ya context matters, but not to a casual observer which is near everyone.
Guys I think this is a good sign.
https://twitter.com/MerriamWebster/s...40554063740928
I'm not sure why they decided to fact check it, may have just been an interesting historical point to them or whoever wrote it. I guess this depends on your point of view because in the article it's clear that it's thought that all European settlements in what would become the U.S. are considered part of the U.S. historically.
They probably felt pressured to get some sort of truth file on dad-joke-personified Tim Kaine.
Yeah, probably a matter of where you'd relate to Columbus or Vespucci. Either way, big whoop.
i keep seeing trumpsters liking various facebook polls and going WOO LOOK AT THIS SUPPORT GONNA WIN IN A LANDSLIDE and im sitting here like SAMPLING BIAS PEOPLE CMAN
trump getting 90%+ support on a trump page? tell me more!
Early voting in Ohio indicates that Clinton is doing at least marginally better than Obama did in 2012.
I cant wait for glorious huffington paint tears
prepare your anus
Spoiler: show
I hate Western Kansas.
The last rally of Hillary with Bill and the Obamas felt a bit touching.