Welp, I really doubt this will lead to anything at all but 'experts' are claiming the results may have been hacked by the Russians
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...facebook_nymag
Welp, I really doubt this will lead to anything at all but 'experts' are claiming the results may have been hacked by the Russians
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer...facebook_nymag
/sigh no just no
Nate Silver agrees:
https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/st...22961541816321
Media post election summed up in one skit.
The Guardian (which is known to be more Liberally biased) is now reporting the same thing that I posted in that NYMag article. Basically more people urging Hilldog to call for a recount.
Would be hillarious if the Trump Troll ends up losing out because he got his Troll Federation friends to rig th election in key states. Would be a massive kick in the nuts to Trump as well that he ended up winning the 1st time because he had the system "rigged" in his favour.
It would be amazing if there was some truth to it and it came into fruition. But right now it just sounds too good to be true. It just comes off as another of those social media "she still has a chance if this happens!!!" kinds of posts that sprouted up a lot right after the election.
They sprouted up during the primary too, except it was Bernie and the DNC electorate.
This one has more merit than Bernie supporters' "HE NEEDS TO WIN 90% of THE VOTES in 100% OF THE STATES LEFT IN PLAY, BUT HE STILL HAS A CHANCE TO WIN!!!!!!!! ZOMGSDLKJSDKNCLDKJSD *mouthfoaming*" that happened during the primaries. Clinton is close to two million popular votes ahead of Trump and in come states, lost by the equivalent of a drop in the bucket.
Oh, definitely. In this case Hillary clearly won the popular.
I think it really highlights the problem with the college. You only need to convince certain states to vote for you, even if the majority of voters don't.
In the Bernie case Hillary clearly one the popular as well <,<;
If people want to waste time with this, be my guest, but I doubt there's anything to find.
[QUOTE=Byrthnoth;6813852]In the Bernie case Hillary clearly one the popular as well
Edit: or rather that's what my original post was getting at.
Interesting historical tidbit. The last time someone lost the electoral college while still winning the popular vote by this % was 1876, shortly after the civil war (when the country was south=demo and north=repub).
There were 20 decisive EC votes disputed until the compromise of 1877, which gave the Republican the presidency in exchange for pulling troops out of the south and ending the Reconstruction (and thus allowing democrats to do things like implement Jim Crow laws.) The loser of the EC (Tilden) that time had 3% more votes, but thanks to the smaller electorate that was only 250k votes.
In terms of raw vote numbers Hillary probably has the largest popular vote victory for an EC loser of all time.
The biggest thing a count would accomplish would be to further delegitimize Trump's win. Basically a few left groups are rallying to try to disrupt in whatever way they can because of the huge discrepancy the popular vote had vs electoral college.
In a way I hope the left and democrats keep the unanswered call up. Republicans have been crying foul about a stolen election for months and now they're telling me california and newyork shouldn't count. They can go fuck themselves.
To be honest, I think all this shit is hurting democrats more than it helps. There is such a thing as losing with dignity.
Lack of dignity is something a number of Republicans have displayed and they've been rewarded for it. That said, Hillary already conceded and she probably doesn't want to seem hypocritical after chastising Trump about the importance of a peaceful transfer of power.
Hillary won't call for a recount/"investigation" and it's for the best.