lmao for someone that agrees w me you been doing a lot of kvetching about it today
lmao for someone that agrees w me you been doing a lot of kvetching about it today
i guess i dreamed all your posts
okie dokie one last try bud, i didn't complain anywhere that i can see, i explitictly refuted Forte's sadism, specified that i was responding directly to the idea of desertion and morality and culpability not delight in death (which, again, i disagreed with), you said we agreed then an hour later threw a bunch of snide shots about how i sided with forte and not you, tossed in some ethnocentrism to end it all
not sure why you're so eager to pick a fight against someone you said agrees with you. might wanna cool down pet your dog or something
There's a difference between not wanting to visually watch people die, and AG's correct assessment that their deaths are a good thing in a vacuum (as soldiers fighting for the wrong side of a war)
And I for one will say that all Russian soldiers are morally culpable for complicity by following morally bankrupt orders. I can't say that I would have the moral fortitude to desert in such a situation, but we are judged by the choices we make of those in front of us. There is no ethical curve for how unlucky we were in the choices presented to us.
Plenty of people in history would have been morally culpable for complicity had they lived in Germany during the Third Reich by fighting for Germany, or failing to hide or assist Jews, or something else. We should count ourselves lucky to have not lived in such times and locations.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
The Tu Quoque Defense famously used by nazis during the Nurnberg trials is just todays Whataboutism.
you come in throwing a fit cause a couple of us showed empathy to russian soilders families or their mindset, strawmanning about people saying there should be no judgement etc and seemed to be annoyed forte was getting rightfully teased for his psychopathy instead of saying rape is bad or whatever. i found all of that to be annoying
can't say i threw a fit, strawmanned, or got annoyed but whatever you need to tell yourself to justify being so pissy
Honestly, you don't have the luxury to guess which soldiers will or won't rape your kids or plant piano bombs. It's get them first or be gotten. I shed no tears in that regard.
I don't take pleasure in seeing it happen when there's no way of knowing who's fighting out of necessity or blood thirst, and I see nothing wrong with that. I feel for the soldiers that go out of desperation because they gave their lives for nothing.
oh fuck they banned John McCain from entering Russia. that's it I guess, game over.
It's wild that there is this much argument over whether or not it's ok to feel pleasure over watching people burn alive.
the majority of the argument has been regarding the moral culpability of Russian soldiers and the moral imperative of desertion and who is mad. think forte is alone in his pro-sadism plank
but let me ask you directly Kran, you are an armed forces type (of sorts [eyyooooooo]), and while it's obviously impossible to say definitively without being in the situation, if the United States waged such an expansionary war of aggression and you were witness to such ubiquitous war crimes do you think you'd have a moral responsibility to oppose them / not actively support them?
to me the answer is crystal clear, and i would only ask dead God for the courage to fulfill the demands of my convictions.
Well obviously yes.
I'd add that it's worth noting that the US military has explicit rules and laws pertaining to protection/no retaliation for refusing unlawful orders. And while I am far too lazy to check, I would wager the Russian military does not contain the same kinds of checks and balances.
i'd imagine Ruskie officers would be a lot more likely to give you a bullet or a court martial than protection yes