And no artificial flavors.
And no artificial flavors.
huh? am I getting confused by the announcements or is everyone else here
there were half a dozen weapons showcased by putin,
his ICBM, Avangard that functions (I assume, since he didn't say otherwise) like an ICBM goes at 20 times the speed of sound - is what many people may be confusing with "the big news"? (Edit: although some images showing flight paths where a missile maneuvers around missile defense systems are labeled by media as being of this Avangard missile so idk, perhaps this is more than just a really fast ICBM as well - haven't watched the actual speech putin gave)
the missile he was most proud of was unnamed and is a nuclear powered cruise missile (so it is UNLIKE an icbm in that it does not need to leave much of the earth's atmosphere like an icbm needs to) capable of "extreme maneuverability" (animated video showing it taking zig-zag paths around 'radars' and over mountains) and of course very high speed (did not say how fast)
this is new because there are no nuclear powered cruise missiles. Wiki says the US gave up development of it (SLAM) in 64
doesn't sound like just a regular missileThe SLAM as proposed would carry a payload of many nuclear weapons to be dropped on multiple targets, making the cruise missile into an unmanned bomber. After delivering all its warheads, the missile could then spend weeks flying over populated areas at low altitudes, causing tremendous ground damage with its shock wave and radiation from its unshielded reactor. When it finally lost enough power to fly, and crash-landed, the engine would have a good chance of spewing deadly radiation for months to come.
jesus christ what kinda sick lotion on the skin mf came up with this weaponThe SLAM as proposed would carry a payload of many nuclear weapons to be dropped on multiple targets, making the cruise missile into an unmanned bomber. After delivering all its warheads, the missile could then spend weeks flying over populated areas at low altitudes, causing tremendous ground damage with its shock wave and radiation from its unshielded reactor. When it finally lost enough power to fly, and crash-landed, the engine would have a good chance of spewing deadly radiation for months to come.
The point was that our missile defense systems don't reliably hit ICBMs (likely-inflated test numbers put them below 50%), so it doesn't really matter how much faster Putin's superrocket goes.
He's just doing the Russian oligarch's equivalent to buying a mustang.
That's besides the point. Using a nuclear weapon against a developed nation is p. much tantamount to ending the world in nuclear holocaust so it doesn't matter how advanced or how many zig zag your nukes do when at the end of the day the person you attack is just going to retaliate with so many nukes that it literally blocks out the sun.
We're way past the point where advancements in nukes matter because we're already past the point of "get hit with a nuke and respond with complete annihilation."
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
as Beernorth said we scoffed at the notion Putin had developed super secret missiles capable of evading our missile defense systems when their existing missile stockpile already evades our missile defense systems.
moreover this is typical Russo posturing. Russia spends 1/10th what we do on their military and we are expected to believe they are developing hitherto unimaginably sophisticated weapons systems because of an animated video? even when they were the Soviet Union and spending 5 times as much as they presently do we consistently had a qualitative technological edge that they could never hope to match, and their much celebrated hardware be it the Krokodil attack helicopter or the T-80 main battle tank or the MiG-29 fighter always proved fundamentally inferior to both their claims and to their western counterparts.
the truly worrying aspect of their military portfolio, as ever, is their inherited nuclear arsenal. they may well be developing marginally better delivery systems than they previously possessed but when they previously possessed 7000 weapons that could end the world multiple times over and we previously possessed no means with which to counter them in a meaningful way does it truly matter.
Russia, so hardcore that they name their attack choppers after a drug that has a side effect of flesh necrosis.
right guys (AG, sal, byrth), I understand what functionality a nuclear triad has and my post was not in contention of the idea that russia's 1st strike could come so quickly and undetected that it would destroy all of the US's nuclear capabilities before they could retaliate. I see how it could have looked like that, though
but it's just not a "regular missile", it's the only one in its class right now (as far as I can tell googling it, and if this one exists at all), which was your joke, AG. Maybe it was too.. something of me to think that you didn't catch that based on your very short joke but hey, I did post with you in mind and if you did know then my fyi was more pointless in that respect than media/putin hailing the uninterceptability of the new ballistic missiles
Archi joked about the speed of the ICBM, which is secondary news (to the unmanned nuclear sub and nuclear powered cruise missile), so I'm thinking he may have missed important info as well
Dasva is only one who mentioned regular missile defense systems since the "big news" missile is a cruise missile while everyone else is on about ICBM defense systems but! it's not like an MRBM because it's not a ballistic missile at all. And the nuclear powered part means its range isn't just longer, but it's so much longer that you'd measure it in days of flight rather than distance of kilometers
I don't know, MAYBE my post was pointless since technically you all could have been on the money and I was doing a lot of interpreting of knowledge based on jokes but I assumed there was at least one person mistaking or combining functions of the announced cruise missile and ballistic missiles or not differentiating the difference between a cruise missile and a ballistic missile. Not a big deal in any case
It's worth noting an unmanned vehicle armed with a nuclear weapon is pretty reckless. Especially one that can be left alone autonomously to decide on it's own. Russia's crazy if they actually did that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...nown-substance
Former Russian spy for the UK, who was reacquired in 2010 in a prisoner swap, has been poisoned with Fentanyl and is currently in critical condition.
It wouldn't be the craziest thing they did with nuclear technology not by far.
In other Russia news Russia Mistakes Video Games for Combat Footage
Neat the trailer to Just Cause 6
Interesting twist in the Russian assassination of a former spy. They apparently used something called a Novichok agent, one of the products of Russia's fourth generation chemical weapons research in the late 80s. It was specifically designed to avoid the detection of NATO forces, is tightly controlled within Russia, and might as well be a goddamned Putin signature.
Also the deadline for Russia to explain wtf happened to Britian just passed meanwhile Russia is demanding samples so they can analyze it.
Russia is cleaning house more openly than normal: https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/13/europ...ntl/index.html
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2018/0...infrastructure
Russian hackers were able to access multiple power grids across the US. Had they wanted to, they could have shut down entire power plants. They were able to gain access by phishing company emails. About 10-15 plants were affected by the breach.
looks like they rigged the daughter's luggage (or something in the luggage). article is short on specifics.
https://nypost.com/2018/03/16/russia...spys-daughter/