2016-2017 NFL Week 6: How will the Chargers blow a lead this week?

[tyven]

Man ever since you went full Trump satire has been completely lost on you. Oh well. Hopefully we get the old krandor back Nov 9

[Krandor]

I would assume satire will be outlawed when the God Emperor ascends to his throne, kind of like how they banned it in North Korea.

[Twilight Sky]

Cam is known to be a huge sore loser, but I have to side with him this time. 1-5 is hard to spring back from.

Also.. wow, when I don't watch ATL games, they win, when I do watch them, they lose. O_o

[Sirbacube]

It's okay guys Gore broke 100 again

[Azull]

i fully expect a pick 6 from Brock any second from now.

[Krandor]

Awesome game

[ninjafox]

Next threat title gotta have something about Dak and Romo or Jerruh's decision

[tyven]

DECISION 2016

[BerenTebogo]

late but...




JAGS

[Rhyis.]

late but...




JAGS

Better than the Colts.

[tyven]

this

D
A
K
S

video is actually pretty funny

https://www.facebook.com/baffmasta/v...6491959773952/

[Rhyis.]

I'll be honest. I had no real hope for Dak, let alone balling out like he's been.
Dude just got our first win at Lambeau in nearly a decade. If Terrance Williams stepped out of bounds we'd be undefeated right now. Shits bananas.

[Moss]

There has been some talk from coaches like Sean Payton and Dan Quinn wanting PI calls (or lack thereof) to be challenge-able. I'm a bit torn on the issue but I've always felt that being able to challenge egregious calls/no-calls would be a positive thing. The real issue would likely be in the final 2 minutes where coaches would be asking for no-calls to be looked at after every play. Maybe you require a coach's challenge to review a penalty play even inside the last 2 mins, but still have automatic booth review for everything else.

[Anoat]

Antone Smith activated by the Bucs on their bye week. That's not a great sign for Doug Martin.

[Rhyis.]

There has been some talk from coaches like Sean Payton and Dan Quinn wanting PI calls (or lack thereof) to be challenge-able. I'm a bit torn on the issue but I've always felt that being able to challenge egregious calls/no-calls would be a positive thing. The real issue would likely be in the final 2 minutes where coaches would be asking for no-calls to be looked at after every play. Maybe you require a coach's challenge to review a penalty play even inside the last 2 mins, but still have automatic booth review for everything else.

I got no problems being able to challenge ref calls, but challenging non-calls would be absolutely terrible imo

[Krandor]

Anything outside of 2 minutes should be open for challenge imo, and anything seriously questionable should be able to be reviewed for under 2.

Yes it could disrupt gameflow, but it's preferable to egregious no calls that bring in to question the results of a game. Plus it let's the network play even more ads during those challenges/reviews

[Moss]

I'm trying to think of big issues - so far the only thing that comes to mind is holding. You probably have to hold that out lest every big play be challenged for holding. Maybe if you make it "egregious" holding with a direct impact on the play.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

[Twilight Sky]

I figure a guy like Sherman who prides himself as the best corner in NFL history wouldn't resort to blatant arm holding.

If the reciever, the one who is obviously getting a birds eye view of what's being done(to him) during a passing play.. should have be able bring it to the coaches attention and challenge the action for not being called.

Problem there though.. receivers would abuse it.

This would be a tough thing to implement.

anyway, I see Dallas is back to having an uncanny ability to produce amazing running backs. Hopefully he's not Jerry'd at the end of the season.

[Byrd]

I'm trying to think of big issues - so far the only thing that comes to mind is holding. You probably have to hold that out lest every big play be challenged for holding. Maybe if you make it "egregious" holding with a direct impact on the play.

I think maybe only Pass Interference should be reviewable, and only because there's really no cap on the penalty yardage for it. The DPI on Sherman would have been a ~50 yard penalty; refs are understandably nervous to make that call at that point in the game. If they call it and they're wrong, they're giving the Falcons a tremendous advantage on what is effectively a hail mary, a low percentage completion play, when it should be over. If they didn't call it and they're wrong, they're ending the game for the Falcons. It's such a no-win. Other than, of course, getting the call right in the first place. Even then, it would have to be 100% obvious, even more so than the current standard. No missed holding or hand checks (like at the start of that play), would have to be as obvious as that play (or the one in the Ravens-Giants game) to overturn it.

I think another compromise might be dropping the penalty to match the college rule - 15 yards and an automatic first down. Refs might be less afraid to make the call at that kind of time, and wouldn't hesitate to make them on a more traditional hail mary, where they're truly loathe to call it.

[Rhyis.]

I'm trying to think of big issues - so far the only thing that comes to mind is holding. You probably have to hold that out lest every big play be challenged for holding. Maybe if you make it "egregious" holding with a direct impact on the play.

Sent from my HTC6525LVW using Tapatalk

That's kind of my issue. If you look hard enough, pretty much every play you'll find a hold somewhere.
Andy Reid will be throwing 100 flags a game.