I'd be fully torqued if Trump pardoned him for it.
I'd be fully torqued if Trump pardoned him for it.
I wouldn't be surprised if there were a sealed indictment for Assange relating to previous actions, in particular the information he got from Chelsea Manning. Back before Assange started playing for Team Trump, plenty of prominent conservatives wanted to see him (and Snowden) brought back to the US for disseminating classified information, along with the entirety of the national security establishment.
But putting that aside, if you read between the lines in the GRU indictment, I'd assue there will be a couple of FBI agents in the UK ready to have a chat with Mr. Assange once he's no longer under diplomatic protection.
The swedes could always pick up their investigation again.
Really the damnable thing would be if the US extradited him and that would be some serious bad news. If it were Obama or Hillary it'd literally be a no brainer they'd go after him but with Trump its anyone's guess.
I hope Mueller is the one playing 4d chess here. Imagine how great this movie is going to be if in the 3rd sequel they extradite this guy to the UK and when they take him into the room for questioning and it's Mueller sitting across from him. Fade to black, roll credits.
Mueller has or will shortly subpoenad Randy Credico - a friend of Roger Stone and Julian Assange.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-10-...r-cat/10382992
Ecuador has ordered Julian Assange to stick to a new set of house rules, including avoiding contentious political issues, cleaning his bathroom and looking after his cat if he wants the internet reconnected.
In a nine-page memo, published by Ecuadorean website Codigo Vidrio, the WikiLeaks founder is prohibited from "interfering in the internal affairs of other states" or from activities "that could prejudice Ecuador's good relations with other states".
That reads like a parent trying to get their child to behave. Is he seriously not cleaning his bathroom or taking care of his own cat?
Sounds like Ecuador doesnt want to incur the wrath of FREEDOM.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Well, DOJ screwed up and accidentally let slip in an unrelated filing that Julian Assange has been charged under seal.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...05a_story.html
Hope this doesn't screw up his extradition.
Not gonna lie. As much as I want to see this guy rot making the reason he released classified documents should not be one. Sets a bad precedent for other actual journalists.
They'll probably charge him using CFAA or conspiracy against the US and not directly on leaking classified info, in order to avoid 1A issues. There's already precedent on the CFAA being (ab)used this way, so I think it's unlikely this particular case will impact how other journalists are treated, one way or another.
I think Assange started out with good intentions but at some point became an FSB asset.
Agree with Gryffes on this one. Started out good and with the noblest intentions...then shit went south real quick.
Disagree. I think he was doing what he always wanted to do, cool spy stuff, and is willing to do it on his own terms with no government oversight. Yall loved it when he was playing this game to your benefit, but then 2016 came around and you saw why we should keep organizations like this on a short leash.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Should we though? Isn't the issue that he became leashed by a foreign power?
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Is that the issue? Idk man I'm not convinced. From my POV hes a sad white boy who wanted to play spy real bad but didnt want to take orders while doing so. He did some arguably good to great things like a decade ago, then another opportunity came to play super spy and he jumped on it cause he wanted that high again. Dude got in over his head and was probably used but only because he wanted so badly to be the antihero he thinks he is. Well...now he is exactly what hes been telling us he wanted to be.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Turns out anonymous posting on the internet isn't a good mechanism to increase transparency
I dont think he ever really had good intentions, his aim was always just to damage the US, didn't Wikileaks fracture early on due to that very issue?
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk