
Originally Posted by
Marootsoobutsu
I mean... what he said wasn't wrong at all? The South was 100% unwilling to compromise on the question of slavery; Lincoln totally was. And by pretty much damn near every account, Robert E. Lee was an exceptionally honorable individual. The Civil War (and really, any war), are fraught with exceptionally noble, honorable people, even if they're on the wrong side. That's not to say everyone on both sides were: there were some skeeves in the Union, but the South was pretty lousy with them, particularly in the senior officer corps. Yeah, there were some jerks in the US, UK, and France, but I mean... Nazis and Japanese Imperials. But most of the folks (especially the enlisted, who were largely conscripted) who fought for Germany weren't particularly better or worse than our guys.
It's 100% fair to say that the poor were manipulated by the elite who wanted to protect slavery, and fabricated that issue into state's rights (a legitimate issue in its own right). And it's 100% fair to say that the Civil War was the result of and response to slavery. It's also 100% accurate to say that the *VAST* majority of people fighting in the Civil War believed they were fighting for freedom, and that the great majority of them (at least until the Union made it to the Deep South) couldn't give two damns about slavery when they enlisted, and when they started. Looking back at that issue with today's morality, and judging the weight of issues in the past is disingenuous and exceedingly arrogant. Union soldiers believed that the maintaining of the Union was the only way in which democratic freedom was possible; Confederate soldiers believed that the federal government was unresponsive to them (it generally wasn't, but that was the message sent by the powerful who controlled information flow to the poor), and was oppressing them (ditto), and was going to turn them into slaves (again, not true). They had *bad* information in the South. And even when you look at someone like Lee, who *DID* have good information, he *hated* the cause of the South, but believed (like most at the time) that State > Union, and that his first duty was not to his own morals or soul, but to his state, and to the men who would die fighting for it.