Imagine my shock when i see Dim white knighting this. In other news, water is wet.
Imagine my shock when i see Dim white knighting this. In other news, water is wet.
It was just clearly a movie written by a non-American about American police and race relations without doing the actual work to learn how things are here. It was beautifully shot and had some strong performances though, but the script was just...off.
Spoiler: show
yeah there's a p basic failure in reading comprehension in people labeling her a hypocrite on account of that Tweet. she's telling people who have worked with known predators what to do, how to make amends for protecting the Weinsteins of the world for decades, it's not really a #believeallwomen thing.
just think you're fundamentally misunderstanding McDonagh's aesthetic if you think it was a movie primarily about movements or ideology or social issues. he is intensely character-focused writer, and while race relations and police brutality are dealt with they are done so more as the backdrop for the deuteragonist's characterization and arc than as a blanket statement trying to make a larger sociological point. i know the prevailing trend in popular art is to make stories that are about something 'bigger', using the movement of the characters as symbol, but McDonagh's story is focused on the individual, on the rage of grief, on redemption, and despite the braying of socially conscious reviewers i never got the impression he was trying to pontificate.
What movie is this?
Ahhh, never saw it.
It wasn't attempting to tell a slice of American life. You uproot the characters to a different country or class and the takeaway is exactly the same. A bunch of people shitty or otherwise getting by and dealing with things they have no idea how to deal with. Even the ending was "yeah lets go do this, wait, now that we've slept on it, this is beyond our lives." The backdrop was there to provide a catalyst/tipping point for all the bullshit they had all just sucked up. It's okay if you didn't like it though, not everything will resonate with everyone every time.
Remember when that one Scot directed an excellent neo-western heist drama, set in West Texas and shot in New Mexico?
I ought to rewatch again.
Asia is now saying that it never happened and that Bennett was trying to hit her up for cash for damages in the tune of $3.5 million. She claims it was Bourdain's idea to pay him off so that his name wouldn't get dragged thru the mud by association.
https://twitter.com/yashar/status/1031915552699179009
Sure blame the dead guy
Another vehement defender of "you must always believe the victim otherwise you're a rape apologist" goes to the "they're lying, it didnt happen" defense when they all of a sudden become the accused. However, unlike Takei's "he said, she said" story, this one comes with actual proof and a previous exchange of hush money. AND she's blaming the whole thing on her boyfriend who committed suicide two months ago.
fuckin lol. AG and Dim whiteknighted for this psychotic predator too, what a take.
Supposedly TMZ has text messages between Bourdain and Asia where he mentions paying him off to get rid of him. She basically admits to having sex with the 17 year old in the text messages but then tries to play it off like she let it happen because it was some fantasy he had for the longest time.
It wasn't raped (sic) but I was frozen. He was on top of me. After he told me I had been his sexual fantasy since he was 12.
Wait, wait. Is this trying to be turned into "I was the real victim here!"?