Actual YouTube/Twitch drama thread

[Mrbeansman]

It's all kind of terrible drama that should have been settled in private but ended up getting them all a bunch of views and subscribers when all is said and done.

Like if you look at it for what it was... Girl gets mad at guy for promoting competitions product, random other dude chimes in. Dude that promoted topic might be allegedly into straight dudes(why does this matter).

Like that's some shit tier drama, idk why anyone cared.

To throw my own off topic tidbit: sorry for getting your gender wrong. I made the mistake of doing no research and not caring about you

Why do you get so salty that people care about this like why do you care?

[Zealot]

you could be reading Tolstoy

How many subscribes did he ever get.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[archibaldcrane]

Still laughing about the idea of tricking a straight man into gay sex

*mouth full of cock* oops, you tricked me!

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[Salodin]

Well James Charles is a beautiful man. Not handsome, but certainly beautiful.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Andalusian girls]

How many subscribes did he ever get.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

one but it was Oprah

[Melena]

It's all kind of terrible drama that should have been settled in private but ended up getting them all a bunch of views and subscribers when all is said and done.

Like if you look at it for what it was... Girl gets mad at guy for promoting competitions product, random other dude chimes in. Dude that promoted topic might be allegedly into straight dudes(why does this matter).

Like that's some shit tier drama, idk why anyone cared.

To throw my own off topic tidbit: sorry for getting your gender wrong. I made the mistake of doing no research and not caring about you

You sure seem to care enough about the winter warning boner when the point wasn't even about that. But don't worry, most people here don't care about you either.

[D44kpunk]

Still laughing about the idea of tricking a straight man into gay sex

*mouth full of cock* oops, you tricked me!

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

basically, as long as they are at the age of consent and not being drugged or some shit it just adds to how stupid this debacle was

[Salodin]

Or...and stick with me on this...the implication was James Charles was using his fame and influence to coerce people, even straight people, to sleep with him.

Would you guys be this flippant if it was an actress using her fame and influence to coerce young women to eat her out for a movie role? This seems no different, even if it is lolYouTube. Maybe you guys are just making jokes like me tho and it's going over my head lol.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[D44kpunk]

maybe i don't know what you mean by fame and influence to coerce people, but that's definitely not the same as "if you do sexual acts with me, i'm going to give you this." feel like unless there are drugs or money exchanged you're not really forcing someone to do something they wouldn't already do. personally i'm not gonna suck brad pitt's dick just because he's brad pitt

if it was a female actress using her fame and not giving something in return then i'd still not have a problem with it.

editting in: by the logic you're getting at, how can any famous/influential person have intercourse with anyone at all? surely fame and influence effects everyone's decisions to some level

[Salodin]

I dont think you really think that, cause theres a lot of gray area in between your definition for things society generally deems as sexually deviant/harrassment. If you think someone who can get your foot in the door will suddenly not help you realize your dream cause you won't give him a hand job, then maybe theres a chance you give him that hand job.

You might not, but just cause you wont doesnt mean that predatory behavior isn't rampant. They basically accused him of typical #metoo shenanigans.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Salodin]

I should add, I dont know if he actually got the straight guy to fuck him. The fact that it happened or didn't isn't the problem though, the problem is he tried to make it happen, or in this case someone lied about him trying to make it happen.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[D44kpunk]

pretty depressed that i know that he didn't:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77uSfqx0iGU

i still don't agree with your premise though, unless there's other elements involved i don't think you can fault someone that's famous/rich/influential for hitting on someone

[Salodin]

There is a very thick line between hitting on someone, and sexually abusing them. Hitting on them is one thing, using their interest in you as an artist as a way of getting into their pants is straight wrong though. Not saying that's what your claiming, I'm just saying that's how a lot of these exploitations go.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[dasva]

maybe i don't know what you mean by fame and influence to coerce people, but that's definitely not the same as "if you do sexual acts with me, i'm going to give you this." feel like unless there are drugs or money exchanged you're not really forcing someone to do something they wouldn't already do.l

[Kaslo]

[Corrderio]

And this is why journalism is such a cancerous industry nowadays. It's about hit pieces and shitty clickbait.

Also surprised no posts on #VoxAdpocalypse.

[Fiye]

Oh you mean the current ad pocalypse that's happening because instead of actually enforcing harassment guidelines against steven crowder they've decided to sidestep the entire issue and just hit everyone with demonetization.

also



show me the fucking lie.

[6souls]

Their negativity comes in many forms. Some YouTubers produce a stream of videos criticizing every imaginable fault a game could have. Visual bugs. Awkward controls. Stupid storylines. Others obsess over game developers’ attempts to fix glitches. There are commentators who rail against efforts to upsell players, who typically shell out $60 for a game. These microtransactions, as they’re known, can include different character designs, new looks for weapons and additional stories, and are a source of constant irritation for vocal commentators, who see them as a rip-off. Others veer into criticism of outspoken game company executives.

Show me a world where Randy Pitchford is a fucking saint.

[Corrderio]

Some YouTubers produce a stream of videos criticizing every imaginable fault a game could have. Visual bugs. Awkward controls. Stupid storylines. Others obsess over game developers’ attempts to fix glitches.

A critic criticizing something? Shocker.

[kuronosan]

A critic criticizing something? Shocker.

I think it's more like nitpicking, which isn't criticizing.