2017-2018 NHL Regular Season Thread (Part 2) - Jagr is Done (with the NHL) and Vegas is in 1st?!

[bori]

Updated rules on goaltender interference:

(ii) Scoring Plays Involving Potential "Interference on the Goalkeeper"
(c) The standard for overturning the call in the event of a "GOAL" call on the ice is that the NHL Situation Room (which shall include a former referee in the Officiating Department in the decision-making process), after reviewing any and all available replays and consulting with the Referee who made the original call, determines that the goal should have been disallowed due to "Interference on the Goalkeeper," as described in Rules 69.1, 69.3 and 69.4.
(d) The standard for overturning the call in the event of a "NO GOAL" call on the ice is that the NHL Situation Room (which shall include a former referee in the Officiating Department in the decision-making process), after reviewing any and all available replays and consulting with the Referee who made the original call, determines that the goal on the ice should have been allowed because either: (i) there was no actual contact of any kind initiated by the attacking Player with the goalkeeper; or (ii) the attacking Player was pushed, shoved or fouled by a defending Player causing the attacking Player to come into contact with the goalkeeper; or (iii) the attacking Player's positioning within the crease did not impair the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal and, in fact, had no discernible impact on the play.

https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-goalten...ed/c-297375900

[bluefan]

Updated rules on goaltender interference:

(ii) Scoring Plays Involving Potential "Interference on the Goalkeeper"
(c) The standard for overturning the call in the event of a "GOAL" call on the ice is that the NHL Situation Room (which shall include a former referee in the Officiating Department in the decision-making process), after reviewing any and all available replays and consulting with the Referee who made the original call, determines that the goal should have been disallowed due to "Interference on the Goalkeeper," as described in Rules 69.1, 69.3 and 69.4.
(d) The standard for overturning the call in the event of a "NO GOAL" call on the ice is that the NHL Situation Room (which shall include a former referee in the Officiating Department in the decision-making process), after reviewing any and all available replays and consulting with the Referee who made the original call, determines that the goal on the ice should have been allowed because either: (i) there was no actual contact of any kind initiated by the attacking Player with the goalkeeper; or (ii) the attacking Player was pushed, shoved or fouled by a defending Player causing the attacking Player to come into contact with the goalkeeper; or (iii) the attacking Player's positioning within the crease did not impair the goalkeeper's ability to defend his goal and, in fact, had no discernible impact on the play.

https://www.nhl.com/news/nhl-goalten...ed/c-297375900

Forget that.

Tonight we fight, fellow playoff team fan.

[bori]

Not seeing the puck in the past the line there, but not 100%, it may have been in.

Guess they threw 'conclusive evidence' out the window there.

https://twitter.com/CBeswick/status/978789883975294977

[Obsidian]

My only assumption is that the league has an overhead angle they didn't provide the trucks with. If it was called a goal on the ice I don't think there's enough to call it back from that angle. Also not enough to call it a goal if they waved it off.

[bori]

My only assumption is that the league has an overhead angle they didn't provide the trucks with. If it was called a goal on the ice I don't think there's enough to call it back from that angle. Also not enough to call it a goal if they waved it off.

From NHL: "The Situation Room initiated a video review, it was determined there were no definitive replays to overturn the Referee's call on the ice. Therefore the referee's call on the ice stands."

It was called a no-goal on the ice, too. lol.....

[bluefan]

Scheifele....why? lol.

[bluefan]

/starts eyeing division banner

[bluefan]

lol.

[bluefan]

6-0 on the homestand. I am satisfied.

[DFJS]

This entire road trip for the Ducks has been a headache. They've been outplayed in every game but still managed to get 5 points so far. In every game they have come out flat and chased from behind. Not something I want to see this late in the season. I give full credit to the other teams. This is just sloppy hockey from a team trying to make the playoffs.

[Vaspinne]

6-0 on the homestand. I am satisfied.

You've been bitching about how terrible your team is all season and this is where it got you. Being satisfied now all but guarantees a first round sweep buddy.

[Cail]

You've been bitching about how terrible your team is all season and this is where it got you. Being satisfied now all but guarantees a first round sweep buddy.

Good

[Obsidian]

Leafs clinched tonight because the Panthers lost. Thanks Sens.

[Judai]

Leafs clinched tonight because the Panthers lost. Thanks Sens.

Caps clinched cause the Devils lost as well!

[Cail]

Caps clinched cause the Devils lost as well!

God damn it Jersey

[bori]

Bruins take first place in the Atlantic/Conference...for now.

[Obsidian]

I think this is basically the first time all season Tampa hasn't been #1.

[NynJa]

I think it was since Oct 18?

[Vaspinne]

#1 in their division to be specific. There was a point in the season a while ago that Vegas was tops in the league

Edit: Er.... missed Bori's post >_>

[Vaspinne]

Chicago had to go to their emergency backup tonight against Winnipeg. Guy was a 36 year old accountant who was just supposed to fill in as a bench warmer but Chicago's other goalie (Delia I think his name is? Was also his first ever NHL game too coincidentally) got injured and the guy had to step in with like 14 minutes to go in the third lol. Made 7 saves on 7 shots, got the first star