W was indeed the worst, his image rehab is like Obama's Nobel - he is benefitting by doing nothing more than not being somebody else.
W was indeed the worst, his image rehab is like Obama's Nobel - he is benefitting by doing nothing more than not being somebody else.
May I present:
Richard Nixon
Jimmy Carter
Dubya wasn't a great president by any stretch, I hope that's not what people think I'm saying here.
Nixon was one of the worst people to ever hold the office.
Carter's environmental work was his only positive imo.
Carter was terrible but Dubya and Nixon have him beat with the whole cause hundreds of thousands of deaths thing
If the onus of post-911 action is entirely put on Dubya, I can see your point. I don't think it's entirely his fault at all.
Every "survey of presidential scholars" since W's term ended have placed W below Carter. A number of them have Bush below Nixon, but the aggregate places Bush just one slot above Nixon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor..._United_States
The "it's not totally Bush's fault, there's a variety of people that Bush appointed who also share the blame" is pretty weak.
Damn, Reagan's legacy is flying around like a bouncy ball.
I agree with these agg rankings though. I'd put dubya maybe 2-3 ranks higher but that's my bias.
i don't think i can respect any rankings that places FDR above Washington
yeah kinda like that time GB1 had 500,000 troops in the region, had just annihilated the Republican Guard, had a U.N. imprimatur and then was like, you know regime change may be more trouble than it's worth
i just don't think anyone with a serious historical understanding and without political bias would place any president above Washington. Lincoln is the only possible counter. FDR gets a lot of Greatest Generation nostalgia glow and as the father of liberaldom is venerated far above his actual accomplishments despite his many failures, despite his deeply unconstitutional and authoritarian nature.