https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54541517
YouTube is banning anti-vaxx covid videos.
t said any videos that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities, such as the NHS or World Health Organization, will be removed.
"A Covid-19 vaccine may be imminent, therefore we're ensuring we have the right policies in place to be able to remove [related] misinformation," the Google-owned service said in a statement.
It said it would remove any suggestions that the vaccine would:
- kill people
- cause infertility
- involve microchips being implanted in people who receive the treatment
YouTube said it had already removed 200,000 dangerous or misleading videos about the virus since February.
Confirmed echo chamber
Just ignore them if you don't want to see them, Facebook. Jesus, you're going to turn it into an echo chamber!
Thats exactly what big microchip wants us to believe.
wouldn't big microchip just be some twat named Chip
Big microchips wouldn't fit in a vaccine though.
https://apnews.com/article/youtube-q...92ce42666d97d8
YouTube to limit all QAnon content and ban conspiracies that can lead to violence. "Tens of thousands" videos and channels have been removed so far.
https://twitter.com/SethDillon/statu...277086211?s=20
no jokes allowed 2020
Babylon Bee is mediocre in general (while also being the absolute height of conservative comedy) but it sure seems to break tech companies' brains.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-54649262
Zuck & Dorsey have been summoned by congress.
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter's Jack Dorsey will be ordered to testify over alleged censorship of a controversial New York Post article.
The article revealed emails and photographs that the New York Post claimed were copied from the laptop of Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden.
Twitter said the story had violated its "hacked materials" policy, but later changed its stance.
Facebook had limited its spread in the news feed while it was fact-checked.
Now, 12 Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee have voted to compel the two chief executives to testify about their handling of the matter.
Ten democrats sat out the session in protest over an earlier vote on Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination.
Sitting out the session so Republicans have free reign to spout nonsense seems counter productive. You aren't punishing them for ACB, you're rewarding them.
it's largely futile because the Republicans don't give a shit, but according to the rules there are supposed to be two or more minority party members present to call a vote or something along those lines
https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewals.../#514e26a66a23
The committee technically needs at least two members of the minority party to conduct any business, per Judiciary Committee rules, but Republicans can change those procedural rules and hold a vote despite not having enough Democrats to form a quorum, a tactic Graham has used in the past.
Ah, ok. Thanks for that.