Speak for yourself, avocados are expensive.
JK Rowling is now apparently racist because they cast an Asian woman to play Nagini’s human form in Fantastic Beasts 2.
wait what. is this the "asians are white" thing?
They mad because a minority woman is playing someone that eventually gets turned into a white man’s pet, is what I’ve gathered.
JK cannot win. Toss a bunch of posthumous representation into the wizarding world: she's just looking for no-risk minority cred; use minorities in current works: racism
I'm so confused. I am just gonna not care.
idc how many trans minority agnostic-islamic pan furries she tells us have been there all along, keep my childhood on the big screen forever
(Papa) John Schnatter Seeks Funding to Purchase Papa Johns
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/pa...any-2018-09-26
I'm of the belief that after someone's written a series and/or made a movie, it's not really theirs anymore. They can't force retcons on people.
I'm of the belief the gender, lack of, sexual orientation, or trans/not of a fictional character is a pretty fucking stupid thing to even remotely care about enough to call someone racist. Or care about at all. Shit its like people can't enjoy things unless they're certain every check mark on the exclusivity spectrum is checked and double checked.
Disclaimer: I'm aware this is a minority of people. And frankly from this articles it was probably just like a handful <10 trolls and it made news cause why not controversy is fun
You can't enjoy this because I'm mad. Man.
Good, I'm gonna fucking tweet the shit out of this and put you on tumblr.
in Rowling's defense there was a decent bit of subtext Dumbledore was gay. Grindelwald was the only passionate relationship of his life, the man loved comfy socks which is queer as hell, McGonagall was the ultimate beardy hag to hang out with an old queen, etc.
retconning Hermione as possibly black is nonsense, but there are even stories of Rowling striking out references to Dumbledore and girls he dated from the movie scripts before she broke the news publicly. most authors write far more about their characters than they put into their books, and i think a lot of the Dumbledore backlash was from reactionary types ignorant of basic literary theory. as Hemingway once put it
all that said it's p great social justice types are in uproar that Rowling is writing with more diversity because the Asian diversity she wrote shouldn't have been the snakey snake WHILE they ignore the fact that Harry's first girlfriend was Asian quod erat demonstrandum fuck outta here.If a writer of prose knows enough of what he is writing about he may omit things that he knows and the reader, if the writer is writing truly enough, will have a feeling of those things as strongly as though the writer had stated them. The dignity of movement of an ice-berg is due to only one-eighth of it being above water.
look all Rowling is saying is that Asian girls are either prospective romantic partners still traumatized by their former boyfriend's homicide or they are reptiles and i think that's really important to talk about in 2018
also Nagini is fucking Hindi for female snake so if they cast a white gal to play her it literally would have been white washing