I love when you guys are like "who is this nazi" and you think they're a nazi because someone else said he's a nazi. There's a plethora of videos out there with him expressing his views and opinions. Maybe one of these days you'll express some freedom of thought and actually look into what the person believes instead of deciding it via buzzfeed-tier blathering
The Nazis never contemplated whether using nuclear weapons on Muslims was a good idea so no, I guess he's not a Nazi.
That sounds like Nazi talk to me. You know who else had a plethora of videos expressing his views and opinions? Adolf Andromedon Hitler, that's who.
Who called him a nazi?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
I'm not about to put in the effort to find it but it was one of his moronic thought experiments.
You're right buddy, he isn't a member of the National Socialist Party. He's just a white supremacist. So much better.
First person to call Harris a Nazi was Krandor, in an attempt to mock people for calling Harris a Nazi, second person was Koul in the very next post doing the exact same thing.
All of this without anyone actually calling him a Nazi.
This would be funny if it wasn't so stupid.
Bunch of Nazis covering each other's tracks in here.
Still waiting for the someone to point out where the hivemind called the dude a nazi lol.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Society as a whole, or at least the parts of society that control the levers of power, are coalescing increasingly against amplifying voices that endorse discrimination. It's the conclusion of the "if you don't like it, don't listen" line of thought. Not only do we not have to listen to it -- why do we tolerate it in any context other than the bare minimum?
There's nothing to be done legally about it because free speech is freedom from government limitation, not entitlement to an audience.
Now yes it's probably preferable to have a society that highly values free speech and is strong enough to tolerate platforming of terrible ideas because they will lose in open debate. But that's the issue. We're at a point where public debate and discourse are not effective checks for a public that is either hyper-polarized or apathetic to the level of disenfranchisement. The damage that Fox News has done to the political system is evidence of that.