Can we get government subsidized vasectomies? I’m ready to do my part
D44k was always an idiot and I couldn't determine if he was contrarian or one of those people you'd call post left.
Dems could still do shit. But years of running hard primaries supporting anti abortion candidates has made anti abortion the mainstream position in our government and now that the right had a chance to do this thanks to several fumbles. If you can argue hillary 2016 then other people can argue Ginsberg should've retired before dems lost the senate in 2014.
But instead we're getting this
https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/statu...t1RxSsbR3VCA9g
We're gonna have a vote yall! We're gonna have a vote that'll fail!
It's everyone's fault. Ginsburg for not retiring during Obama's term. Hillary for not running a better campaign and winning. Bernie for staying in too long, making the primary too bitter, and solidifying his base as against the "mainstream" not just against the right. Biden for not running in 2016. Every Bernie voter who didn't hold their nose and vote for the lesser evil. Every disenfranchised voter for thinking there was no difference between neoliberal centrism and a fascist alt-right.
One thing about Roe being overturned snapping these state bans into effect is that some of these state bans were written in the literal 1800s, with no exceptions for rape, incest, or life of the mother at risk.
You can't simply drive to another state with an ectopic pregnancy, it's an emergency that requires an immediate abortion, and doctors aren't going to risk felony charges and years in prison to save a pregnant woman's life. People will die.
Let's not let the Palm Beach County board of elections off the hook here
What is the actual point of codifying Roe at this point you really think this SC will let it stand?
Definately looks like a Republican operation to me, they strategically "leaked" this with talking points all lined up for every outlet. Seems like the intent is to desperately spin it as a Dem "insurrection" against the court process (absurd it's not even a crime), and to try and deligitimize Garland by pointlessly demanding he investigate/punish someone. Keep your eyes out for what looks like a manufactured controversy here pushed by the usual suspects online to distract from the Jan 6 hearings exposing Republicans. For example I would totally see them setting up a left appearing patsy to pin this on, maybe some Jimmy Dore type purchased assclown who only grandmas think is actually a Democrat.
https://twitter.com/Francesca1Diasi/...76TEnf8-pvGqwA
https://twitter.com/Francesca1Diasi/...76TEnf8-pvGqwA
https://twitter.com/GOPoversight/sta...76TEnf8-pvGqwA
https://twitter.com/davetroy/status/...76TEnf8-pvGqwA
It's still preferable to not just give up and assume SCOTUS will be evil, let them keep showing they are and motivating voters more to demand expanding the court. Also the court review takes lots of time, and lives will be saved in that time. Legislation is supposed to supersede such a thing until they make up more bullshit.
Despite the supermajority they did not have a pro-abortion supermajority, at least three of those 60 were from conservative states including our favorite spoiler jackass Manchin. Also the fact that Roe had been law for decades and although overturning it was considered possible someday it seemed fucking crazy. Then shit went completely fucking crazy.