
Originally Posted by
Lyltia
I'll try again, and let me again emphasize that this is an exercise in empathy, views expressed are not my own, etc.
A person is able to believe that every fetus deserves to be carried to term, and that every baby is born should be provided for by a generous, comprehensive safety net. These two beliefs are not in direct conflict, and this is not a hypothetical or even rare position for a pro-life person to take.
However, in America 2022, you cannot cast a vote that satisfies both of these objectives. You're either voting for the former or the latter, or not voting at all.
The entire point of voting is to direct the government to use governmental power to achieve your policy goals, right? So, looking at this problem logically:
-If you vote D, the government will use its power to protect abortions and provide the safety net.
-If you vote R, the government will use its power to ensure births.
But these people are activists, meaning they spend their time, money, and effort in pursuit of their policy goals beyond just voting.
-If you vote D, activism would involve getting more babies born... which means interfering with people obtaining legal abortions, which society only tolerates to a point, greatly limiting the impact you can have.
-If you vote R, activism would mean helping provide for the babies that are born.. which means donating/volunteering/adopting, which society actively rewards, encourages, and places few limits upon.
It seems pretty logical to me in this case that voting R is the option that achieves their goals the best.
This is not hypocrisy, it's living in the real world and making the best choice possible out of imperfect options.
-
Also... Forte, it seems to me that your thought process is as follows:
-Vote all D: Good
-Vote all R: Evil
-Vote any mix of the two ever for any reason: Stupid and/or hypocritical
Yes/No?