Even for the US, YCS is largely center-left with a coating of left-left and a handful far-left Twitter Warriors.
On the New Zealand scale this is a Conservative message board, mate.
Who is far left besides Milkster and I suppose Tymon after his great awakening.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
All of us obviously
I thought you guys knew, there is no Center, Center-Left, or Center-Right. It's either Far Left Communist or Far Right Fascist. There are no others.
I guess if you're far enough on one side you can't see much of the other so just assume it's all far away.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Bruh I thought CNN was more left than MSNBC hope I don't get bant for my opinion
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
The hilarity of all this labeling is that generally people who are "far" anything see themselves more towards the center, and those truly in the center are generally ostracized by both sides as either being too far towards the other guy, or not radical enough towards their side.
It's why echo chambers are so popular.
Literally every far left or right person ever: "they disagreed with me therefore they're way further on the opposite side".
Yeah it's not like he has secret meetings with Putin that get revealed later, or that he tries to prevent any details of those meetings from getting out even to people in his inner circle. Oh wait...instead, the dumb among us were led to believe that we had a Russian puppet for president who was skyping putin every night for what he should tweet next, which not only makes us look weak as a country but also makes us look colossally retarded.
Anyone who thinks this proves Trump is clean when we haven't even seen what Mueller said is showing their cards right now.
The secret meetings with Putin are probably the dumbest and most overtly sketchy pieces of evidence too, it's almost comical levels of visible guilt.
He's the fucking President, all he really needs to do is just say "yeah, I'm a world leader, we meet sometimes."
Whether this "proves Trump is clean" is less relevant than whether it "slams the door on Trump facing consequences for anything he may have done regarding Russia" which it emphatically does.
All these "what if's" and contemplation are over a letter released by an appointee of Trump after he fired the last dude for not being bro enough to him. Plus how many people has he appointed that haven't been caught lying their asses off and forced to resign because of some scandal or another.
They made a critical mistake focusing on the election so much on public appearances, because the American public didn't give a shit about the things he was actually guilty of as a result. All Barr needed to do is what he did, which is say "well they said he colluded and obstructed justice which this report refutes so there".
Without the full report, or an investigation, which we aren't likely to ever see, you cannot refute that.
Wasn't the whole investigation neutered as much as it could be without actually being shut down? If I understand it correctly they moved the objective of the investigation so many times and narrowed it down until its purpose was so specific in scope that it couldn't help but have a "positive" outcome for the president. IE it was only allowed to investigate the very specific topic of collusion between the president and Russia directly but not through other acting parties or investigate campaign finance law violations etc.
In the meantime several criminal investigations are ongoing involving the president at state levels. But maybe I am interpreting it incorrectly. This shit gets so complicated.