Someone other then Trump winning in 2020...
Oh sweet Summer child.
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk
Someone other then Trump winning in 2020...
Oh sweet Summer child.
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk
CNN reporting that "Sources: Trump has been pushing to not only reinstate, but expand family separation policy."
More CNN reporting:
"Sources: Trump ordered Nielsen and Pompeo to immediately shit down part of border two weeks ago, but backed down"
I guess it is kind of a shit show, I just didn't expect Trump to be so self aware about it.
Sent from my SM-N950U1 using Tapatalk
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/0...rvice-director
Mar-A-Lago breach cited as the reason for the dismissal
They are just going deep and we are getting conflicting statements, nothing new for this administration. Rumor that this has been in the works for over a week, so before the chinese lady at Maralago. And also this gem that was revealed at the time it originally broke.
The Secret Service said in a statement that it "does not determine who is invited or welcome at Mar-a-Lago; this is the responsibility of the host entity.
"The Mar-a-Lago club management determines which members and guests are granted access to the property."
https://twitter.com/SecPompeo/status...63092219363330
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47857140
In response, Iran has declared the US Military as a Terrorist Organization.
This can only have a positive outcome
Guess I'm a terrorist now.
Nah, I'm not in the mood to be givin nobody "Freedom" right now. I'm busy making sure all these brown kids never see their brown parents again.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
What's the stats on presidential reelections during wartime? Almost 100%?
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I mean last I checked we were at war with terror.
It's a good thing Hillary didn't get elected, she would have had us at war w...
...oh.
So technically its 100%, since we know trump ain't leaving without an election.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Except Bush Sr. No new taxes got him.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/0...rbus-subsidies
https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files...oduct_List.pdf
Trump teases new tariffs for Europe after Airbus received "unfair subsidies." What he is actually doing is fighting on behalf of Boeing.
The proposed tariffs would cover not only aircraft but also wine, cheese, woolen suits and other signature European products.
President Trump touted the proposed tariffs on Twitter, arguing the European Union has "taken advantage of the U.S. on trade for many years."
The proposed levies represent the latest salvo in a long-running dispute between Airbus and its U.S. rival Boeing. According to the World Trade Organization, both companies have been the beneficiaries of unfair government subsidies.
The administration estimates that Airbus subsidies are costing U.S. companies $11 billion a year in lost market share. If the WTO approves that figure this summer, the administration will be ready to impose retaliatory tariffs immediately.
The move comes as Boeing is under pressure. Its best-selling jet, the 737 Max, has been grounded worldwide following two deadly crashes. As Aviation Week's Graham Warwick recalled, the 737 Max was hastily developed in response to a competing jet from Airbus.
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/0...ury-department
White House lawyers met with the Treasury Department before the House made a request for Trump's tax returns.
The provision the House enacted actually gives Trump little leeway to deal with.Under questioning by Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., at a House subcommittee hearing, Mnuchin said, "I want to be very clear and not misleading. I acknowledge that there were conversations. I am not briefed on the full extent of those conversations."
Quigley told Mnuchin "we would greatly appreciate it" if Treasury would report what White House officials had said.
George Yin, a tax law professor at the University of Virginia, said past case law should give the administration no leeway.
"The provision does not give any basis for the Secretary of the Treasury to refuse the request," he said.
He said the provision now being invoked by Democrats appears to have been used in cases ranging from President Richard Nixon's tax returns in the 1970s to the alleged IRS targeting of conservative tax-exempt groups in the Obama administration. The evidence is circumstantial, according to Yin, since records and correspondence haven't leaked and are exempted from Freedom of Information Act requests.
The provision dates back to 1924, when Congress was investigating scandals from the administration of President Warren G. Harding, who had died the year before. Among the scandals: Millionaire banker and investor Andrew Mellon had held on to investments when he became Treasury secretary, and had allegedly used inside information to profit.