I can actually get on board with the lack of gay characters point you're making but
A) the original conversation was about Rowling saying characters are gay (after she'd already sold all her books and made all her money) therefore changing her stories postmortem versus the Russos confirming or denying fan questions about things that weren't shown on camera
B) Rowling taking the incredibly safe route of becoming a billionaire and then sending some tweets about how Mcgonagall's college roommate was totes bisexual and Grawp experiments with autoerotic asphyxiation isn't the same as the Russos confirming well ahead of time that there will be more openly gay characters in the movies to come.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
XI Wiki




