I remember seeing a news alert pop up about it being false on my phone but I didn't click on it so I'm not sure where it came from.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
Yeah MLK had a major history or supporting violence you’re right.
Dude what in the actual fuck? I know you never change your mind about anything but the way you interpret the world around you is absolutely baffling. Don’t get me wrong I’m not about to go support a mob over people like you because I know you’re the absolute minority in many ways but god damn lol. You are one astounding individual.
He actually started becoming more radicalized before the FBI had him killed. I see someone has never read A letter from a Birmingham jail in its entirety.
I MUST make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the last few years
I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great
stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizens Councillor or the Ku Klux Klanner but the white moderate
who is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace
which is the presence of justice; who constantly says, "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods
of direct action"; who paternalistically feels that he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of
time; and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." Shallow understanding from people of
good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more
bewildering than outright rejection.
In your statement you asserted that our actions, even though peaceful, must be condemned because they precipitate violence. But
can this assertion be logically made? Isn't this like condemning the robbed man because his possession of money precipitated the
evil act of robbery? Isn't this like condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical
delvings precipitated the misguided popular mind to make him drink the hemlock? Isn't this like condemning Jesus because His
unique God-consciousness and never-ceasing devotion to His will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion? We must come to see,
as federal courts have consistently affirmed, that it is immoral to urge an individual to withdraw his efforts to gain his basic
constitutional rights because the quest precipitates violence. Society must protect the robbed and punish the robber.
I have. And I specifically chose my words. He did not have a HISTORY of supporting violence. So your one post can be followed up by literal books proclaiming the opposite.
You’re still missing the point because you constantly distract and deflect and attempt to belittle.
Side note:
Can you not see how insanely impressionable of an individual you are? You’re constantly demonstrating your influence through quotes to articles, snippets and references. Use your own words and thoughts man It’s fine to be an individual without citations.
Whoa we talking about conspiracy theories now?
He never was anti-violence he was very I understand why people are violent and it's the actions the masses who feel unheard take.
That side note is psuedo enlightenment and dumb as fuck. We literally learn everything around us from quotes, articles and consuming different types of things. Using these to also back up what you're saying doesn't make you impressionable.
I've said what I had to say and that moderates like you create a false equivalency between alt right and left wing protestors and they're not the same and pretending that they're even near each other is intellectually dishonest and wrong. Throwing milkshakes and punching nazis will never be within the same universe of reprehensible behavior as mass murder.
Now we’re just getting into what in the actual fuck territory dude. I’m not going to argue and trade quotes about MLKs belief system with you, clearly your interpretation is. I just don’t know.
I’m not saying they are nor did I ever claim for them to be. But if you look at what you’re shrugging your shoulders at, I’m telling you, you’re silly. You’re vocally supporting poor behavior. Quoting MLK by saying moderates suck in defense of people throwing milkshakes and other silly provocative acts is just got to be the stretch of the century.
So yes. When you “use the world around you” in the way that you do, it defines you as impressionable. You haven’t taken the time to really dissect a lot of these things. So much of why you say and do is conflicting and I’m not the first person to tell you that.
If many people in even a small subset community like this all see the same thing in you, are we all really wrong?
Mythe - if white supremacists march in our streets unopposed, does that strengthen or weaken their cause?
They can march all they want dude. How many people are following them? Do I need to go tell them to go home because they have 50, 150? 300? People in one place in a country of 350 million? These people aren’t making a difference regardless of how dangerous their accused views may be. Even if they’re so insanely offensive to me I’m secure enough in my self to know they’re so far from the majority it doesn’t warrant media coverage. The only reason you and I even know about that crap is because someone’s making money off it.
Do I agree with what they’re saying (if they’re even truly nazis or fascists or racists or whatever)? Nope. Am I going to go throw milkshakes at them because we don’t see eye to eye? Hell nah. That’s hilariously stupid.
That’s such a trap of a question that literally has no appeasing answer to it. If you say you wouldn’t go fight nazis you’re a terrible person and I’d you say you’d pay them no mind you’re enabling them. Think beyond that type of shit come on now.
throwing milkshakes is kinda brilliant
what other food items might make satisfactory projectiles?
it's not really a trap question. it's pretty simple to answer non violence with non violence, archi is just next level idiot when it comes to any real issues.
shit is situational, if nazis are rounding up jews and burning them alive then obviously violence is needed. if they are a nazi journalist with no history of violence walking unarmed through the street it is not ok to run up and punch them or throw quick drying cement at them. it's not complicated.
fact of the matter is though no one in here is going to run up and punch nazi's anyways, the people claiming they would don't have the balls and wouldn't risk their livelihood for something like that because deep down they know it's next level stupid they just want to seem macho on an internet forum.
JR Smith threw a bowl of soup at an assistant coach once and it was one of the finest moments in NBA history
JR Smith might be my spirit animal
this is definitely a trickier toss than a milkshake but nonetheless can be highly effective. it probably shouldn't be scalding. let us add warm soup to the list of approved projectiles to hurl at marching white supremacists
thank you kindly for your contribution