Warren is crushing these town halls though - "charisma" is a slippery-to-meaningless concept, but who is actually listening to her speak nowadays and coming away with "I dunno she kinda sucks and is lame"
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Warren is crushing these town halls though - "charisma" is a slippery-to-meaningless concept, but who is actually listening to her speak nowadays and coming away with "I dunno she kinda sucks and is lame"
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
charisma is the ability to make people devote themselves to you and is more important than any policy position for a politician
Kinda too many candidates right now - for a contested convention you need 3-4 strong candidates who are consistently getting 15%+ of each state. Below that, you get no delegates. Right now in most states only Biden and Bernie top 15%.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
also, camp lemonyay's DFAC was tits, and Bahrain is 11/10, would go again
I assure you those guys were already conservative and want nothing more than to legalize weed.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...amp/ncna850406
Maine and Vermont don't disenfranchise prisoners. Being extremely white states is probably not a coincidence.Joseph Jackson was one of the millions of Americans inspired by Barack Obama's 2008 White House bid. A black man in the nation's whitest state, he coordinated voter registration drives and cast his first-ever ballot for the candidate who would become the nation's first African-American president.
And he did it all while incarcerated in a maximum-security prison, serving 19 years for manslaughter.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I'm finding this dumber as it goes along.
Taking the most extreme examples and using it as an excuse to justify the continued disenfranchisement of millions of nonviolent offenders in prisons throughout the nation, even as those prisoners are used to weight voting districts, is shitty and dumb. Taking people's rights away and dehumanizing them in prison has given us the highest recidivism in the world, maybe time to try something else, especially when that something else could be as simple as "hey, you killed a guy? No vote. You stole $10 from a convenience store counter, felt bad and brought it back? Here's your ballot."
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
You say that as if there is an alternative where no people die.
I'm not saying we need to first strike China, but to think that China and Russia aren't revisionist and that we don't have to consider the implications of any action or inaction we take on our position in the geopolitical hierarchy is delusional.
Gred in here like "if we didn't invade Iraq, China or Russia would've!"
he's saying there are revanchist, expansionist powers on this planet whose behavior is presently constrained by the American-led order, and were the American strategic umbrella withdrawn tomorrow wars would break out across the globe. Taiwan, Ukraine, and the Korean Peninsula would likely be the scenes of the first fighting, but they would not be the last, and any new world order established by our geopolitical rivals in China or Russia would prove itself more harmful than ours.
If someone says "warhawk" and Iraq isn't the first thing that pops into your head, and you start blathering about Russia and China you look like an idiot.
Nah Pete would definitely be at the very least Clintonesque as a warhawk. Dude marched off to Iraq after attending Harvard and worships troops.
Onion is gold btw
https://politics.theonion.com/town-h...ion-1834247611
https://twitter.com/RobHerring/statu...455301120?s=19
Guys I'm starting to get nervous help