Iran - It's Not Just Hostages and Arms Deals Anymore

[Melena]

I’m pretty sure you don’t understand the ramifications of a foreign power outright assassinating a former U.S. president. Regardless of who he is.

Not sure getting “tricked” into it is even a factor unless you’re trying espouse the same conspiracy nonsense Qanon thrives on.

Think he meant more us going into iraq when it was Saudis that were the 9-11 hijackers

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Xno Kappa]

Think he meant more us going into iraq when it was Saudis that were the 9-11 hijackers

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Except WMD was always an abstract reason for war.

Killing a former President is a definitive and tangible reason to glass them.

[Xno Kappa]

I know you weren’t one of them Melena, but this just reminds me of the retards on this forum hoping for the death of Americans with a response from Iran after Trumpito killed their general.

Reminder it’s stupid easy to use the search function before anyone on here denies it.

[Salodin]

If you're gonna double down on thinking BG would hand wave trump dying after everyone here immediately knew a dude would get banned for threatening trumps life on these very forums, and agreed with the ban decision, then you got some receipts to provide.

Cause it seems you're just projecting some shit on a bunch of posters that they never said.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Xno Kappa]

Yeah bro. I just made it up. My bad.

[Salodin]

Apology accepted

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[archibaldcrane]

Except WMD was always an abstract reason for war.

Killing a former President is a definitive and tangible reason to glass them.

We shouldn't go to war with Iran if they assassinate Trump.

[Zealot]

We shouldn't go to war with Iran if they assassinate Trump.

We would go to war with Iran if an Iranian assassin pushed Jimmy Carter over and breaking his hip killed him 3 months later. If a drone hit Trump on the golf course we'd be launching troops out of Israel and Saudi Arabia the next day.

Sent from my SM-N981U using Tapatalk

[Salodin]

Wholely depends if they single target or aoe trump and hurt a lot of normies in the process. Trump did the exact same thing to Iran that people are saying we should go to war for if they do to us, but fuck that. If we don't want the world trying to assassinate our politicians, than maybe we shouldn't be assassinating politicians around the world. If they only took him out I'd be livid, but I'd understand. I'd prefer super harsh economic sanctions, but I don't want anymore soldiers dying in the name of this failure of a president.

I don't get the hard on for open warfare when we haven't won a war in quite awhile.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Qalbert]

Think people are confusing whether we "should go to war" with whether we "would go to war"

[Salodin]

I think that depends tho. You think we're going to war if trump drinks radioactive tea and is the only one murdered? Ehhh not so sure about that one.

A missile strikes the panhandle, and creates a crater in Mira Lago with Trump and Barron in the middle of it? Sigh...guess we gotta go to war...

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[BerenTebogo]

It is pretty amusing that anyone thinks we would not go to war over the assassination of Trump.

Can debate “should” for the next 20 years but we would be wheels up with the biggest deployment of bombers ever seen in our lifetime within 24 hours.

[Byrthnoth]

If he drank some polonium tea I would happily be part of the cover-up tho

[Roranora]

what if he just dies, we took his Twitter after all

how long did JoPa last after we took Penn State from him? 4 months?

perhaps a poor example

[Salodin]

A nonviolent, nonmassacre assassination of Trump forcing President Biden to put troops on the ground? Sure, but troops on the ground =\= open warfare akin to the Bush years.

I'd expect some troops on the ground, but we already have "some" troops on the ground all around Iran already. I'd expect crippling sanctions, the kind that will destabilize the region even worse, but I strongly doubt were going to engage in the type of open warfare Bush got us into for assassinating a former president when that president assissinated an active politician/general in said country that killed him.

Biden led regime change in Iran, because they assassinated Bidens unpopular political opponent? Idkkkkk

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Salodin]

This is silly tho, ain't no state gonna attack the US of A regardless. Those days are long gone, now they finance proxies to do it for them instead.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[NynJa]

If another country assassinates your previous president, no matter how shitty he was, and you let it slide...that is a HUGE showing of weakness.

[archibaldcrane]

Better than actually weakening your country with a new war costing hundreds of billions at least.

[Salodin]

If another country assassinates your previous president, no matter how shitty he was, and you let it slide...that is a HUGE showing of weakness.

How is crippling sanctions that leave your country poor and starving, "letting it slide"?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Guyverarmor]

How is crippling sanctions that leave your country poor and starving, "letting it slide"?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Agreed. I would rather ruin them economically and sanction the fuck out of em for years to come as punishment. This would go for any president. Thousands of troops and billions of dollars shouldn't be lost because of some ex-president biting it.