Finally, something [grammar] Nazis and Dems can come together on
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Finally, something [grammar] Nazis and Dems can come together on
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I'm still trying to figure out how
"My colleagues directly related this information to me, I'm telling you exactly what they told me, several of them providing consistent details of the same event at different times" (what's in the actual complaint that anyone can read) became
"He just heard it somewhere, totally unreliable, doesn't know anything for certain" in the media quartz is consuming.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
The most ridiculous part of any Trump supporting argument here is that you don't even need the media. It's totally optional. Everything was publicly released. Just go read it..
Not true. A different prosecutor said that. The one fired dropped a witness statement saying his firing was from pressure from Biden.
But its irrelevant because he sucked. He was supposed to go after russian corruption following their president fleeing to Russia, and instead he went after a company that bidens son was a part of, took em to court and lied by omission cause when the defense dropped their receipts all they owed was some back taxes. Between that and his failures elsewhere, he was deeply unpopular and eventually fired when the US threatened to stop aiding the ukraine until this bozo was out.
Here's his claims against Biden and co.
https://www.scribd.com/document/4276...okin-Statement
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
For all the claims of conspiracy, I think it's pretty noteworthy that after deep russian corruption where his president fled the nation was exposed, this prosecutor goes after a company with american backing and fails in his court case.
In america we call that a shitty lawyer. In conservative media we call that the deep state.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Like fuck even if they are corrupt, how you gonna go after american corruption when you're being paid be western allies to go after russian corruption?
Dude just doesn't know how to corrupt lmao
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
The article is whatever but good lord the shade at the end.
https://news.yahoo.com/pelosi-trump-...135005946.html
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk
I thought Hunter was hired after the corruption happened?
Hunter was there for a long time. Idk what corruption is always alluded to, other then the right complaining that Hunter made 50k/month working as the head of a company as if american CEOs dont make millions more than that...
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
I hate how mentally ill the right wing can be. The latest now is well why didn't they try to impeach Obama for Libya, that was worse.....
That's a great question. Why didnt republicans pursue of power like democrats are? Hmmm
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Totally innocent ya'll.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN1WB2DE
“What ... Democrats are doing to this country is a disgrace and it shouldn’t be allowed. There should be a way of stopping it, maybe legally through the courts,” Trump said upon returning from a trip to New York where he attended the U.N General Assembly.
.![]()
https://theintercept.com/2019/09/25/...y-upside-down/
Guartz you should probably read this I dunno seems kinda important.
Be that as it may Hunter Biden’s career makes absolutely no sense to me. If hunter hadn’t worked for a hedge fund (an unregistered entity with the SEC and typically viewed as very poor on a resume) and he was let’s say a cofounder of an Investment advisory firm that went under he would’ve had his securities licenses revoked for a minimum of 10 years. He wouldn’t even legally be allowed to serve in some of the other capacities he did. Why would people hire this guy let alone allow him to manage a company or sit on their board, Yale graduate aside this guy wreaks man.
Not trying to distract from the main topic here. Obviously yes this is about the presidents actions as head of office, but this subplot is one that is interesting to me. This guy has enjoyed a fantastic career based on... what performance exactly?
It's obvious that he was hired because of his family name, either to impress other business partners and/or to get a light touch from regulators/feds/etc.
But as far as Joe Biden and the Obama administration goes, there's no evidence that his presence had any effect.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I wouldn’t assume that it does or doesn’t I just can’t fathom why any company would want this guy making any decisions at all for them. Blows my mind.
It's hard for us to understand the upper echelons of society where those undeserving nonetheless get passed along like golden tickets from venture to venture.
To a point, we have to make a distinction between the son and the father here. I see no real evidence that Joe actively tried to get him in the position he was eventually in, contrary to Trump pulling his family in to far more vital US roles. The latter of which has all those CoIs and emoulment concerns.