that joke would kill in South Africa
that joke would kill in South Africa
much like the British ayyyyyyyyyyy
Truly if the libs deny Trump the Nobel Prize not for unifying Korea then he should at least get it for ending drug cartels with Tender-Age Shelters.
At this point border agents are begging for more funding so they can keep those people in better conditions and from what I'm seeing it's the left holding anything up because they want to oppose Trump at every turn.
I haven't heard any solutions for this just blaming the right.
The solution is to stop keeping so many people in cages.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Or they want Trump to stop creating the dumpster fires so that we don't have to put them out?
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/imm...-wall-n1000706House Appropriations Committee Chairwoman Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., said the Trump administration's "callous immigration policies" had "contributed to a humanitarian emergency on the border," adding that the funding request appeared to "double down on cruel and ill-conceived policies" Nevertheless, Lowey added, House Democrats "will carefully review this request in its totality and, where possible, work with the Senate and the White House to make conditions at the border more humane.”
Or are we talking about how Trump would request funds for national security, the Democrats would say we'll give you this much money but it can't be used for the wall, and then Trump would throw a fit?
And for the record, the Dems fucking funded it but Trump didn't like the restrictions it put on his ability to continue jailing people.
https://ktla.com/2019/06/25/house-se...ned-at-border/
"The bill contains more than $1 billion to shelter and feed migrants detained by the border patrol and almost $3 billion to care for unaccompanied migrant children who are turned over the Department of Health and Human Services. It seeks to mandate improved standards of care at HHS "influx shelters" that house children waiting to be placed with sponsors such as family members in the U.S.
Both House and Senate bills ensure funding could not be shifted to Trump's border wall and would block information on sponsors of immigrant children from being used to deport them. Trump would be denied additional funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention beds.
....
The White House has threatened to veto the House bill, saying it would hamstring the administration's border security efforts, and the Senate's top Republican suggested Tuesday that the House should simply accept the Senate measure — which received only a single "nay" vote during a committee vote last week.
just release them into the wild and they can live on a nice farm upstate where your childhood dog went
yes, especially for those who know how to use them
I've dealt with lots of them who are being used and abused by companies and people on this side of the border because you keep them without a legal status and they have no way to go after people who didn't pay them. Go on white savior
I'd prefer we legalize them and let them become citizens, but I'm not going to argue for spending billions to get rid of them considering they are good.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Gred just dropped two good posts with links and proof that backs up his argument. Why did that shit get ignored? Where's the BG right that was just trying to make an argument?
I mean the solution is safe haven laws that grant the right to sue for poor conditions or violation of minimum wage laws without the fear of deportation. But that would encourage them to keep taking our jerbs so no way that will happen
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Yet again, I have no problem with legalizing legit asylum seekers. My brother in law escaped communist Poland with his family when he was 13 and was put in a migrant camp in Austria while waiting to immigrate to the US. They separated them in there and there's reasons these type of facilities do so. In that case he was saying they were keeping teenage and older males away from girls because it can create trouble. I have hard time believing border agents get off on separating families, there's multiple factors you need to take into account. Especially in situation where people can't prove those are their children. You have tons of shady element using this crisis for their own gain.
What's the grift? Bringing someone else's kids across the border for...
Sexual slavery? Child labor? Or is it just a desperate Guatemalan mother sending her gang-pressured 10 year old boy with an adult friend heading up in a caravan to get him out of harm's way?
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk