
Originally Posted by
Zealot
So you're either misunderstanding the idiom or inferring that the inverse of "stand for nothing, fall for everything" is true while also asserting that Warren is somehow unique and should be given special scrutiny despite literally every candidate having a broad policy base.
If you're going to circle it back to "central proposal" that's already been addressed and if you want to argue it that's fine but there is years of Warren's history, her major sponsored and co-sponsored legislation, her public speeches, and her own campaign website outlining how ending government corruption is her top priority and how everything else she does stems from that. So if you want to say she doesn't have one that's fine but it more demonstrates how you don't know and didn't bother to find out if that was true or not before speaking.
Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk