Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[6souls]

Damn, if Judaism becomes a nationality then that makes me racist.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...emitism-israel
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/10/u...ive-order.html

First reported by the New York Times, the policy would broaden the federal definition of antisemitism, according to administration officials who spoke to various news outlets on condition of anonymity. By expanding protections granted by title VI of the Civil Rights Act to people subjected to antisemitism, the order could also redefine Judaism as a race or nationality.

Title VI bars discrimination on the basis of race, color and national origin at colleges and universities that receive federal funding. One official said Trump’s order would make it clear that title VI will apply to antisemitism as defined by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. That definition says antisemitism may include “targeting of the state of Israel”.

The move has drawn criticism from those who worry that such a characterization of Judaism as a race or nation is itself antisemitic.

A second official insisted the order was not intended to limit freedom of expression and was not aimed at suppressing the boycott, divestment, sanctions movement known as BDS, which aims to support Palestinian aspirations for statehood by refusing to purchase Israeli products or invest in Israeli companies.

A third official said the order was a response to an alarming rise in the number of antisemitic incidents on campuses and would mean that Jewish students who are discriminated against for their religion have the same kind of recourse as black students who are victimized by racism.

[Mertron]

college students will have to change their signs to “i am specifically protesting the nation of israel” i guess

[Mertron]

you’ll never get on college gameday with that on a sign though, what’s the point

[guartz]

You can literally take my quote of what you typed. Then take that webpage I linked and compare the two side by side and see that you copied and pasted....... you know what? I'll do it for you.



You are not Trump in front of his dumbass rally supporters. You can't lie and not get called out.

Wait wait let me get this straight. You are accusing me of copying that text block from a website, instead of IG report pdf? It's identical text block... Because why .. I'm too stupid to read the pdf? I don't even understand what you are accusing me of?

There are stuff from the IG report that I quoted in my original post that is not in that article? Did I do that just to throw you guys off?

Are you like a paranoid person or something?

[Roranora]

please don't banish him to spam, jfc

[6souls]

Maybe if you quoted different parts, you could have come across as original. That's point-for-point, though.

[Zealot]

No one is buying it.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Fiye]

please don't banish him to spam, jfc

Spam deserves him. Maybe Day will become a truther.

[Guyverarmor]

Holy fuck at this point just banish his ass to Spam. I want Day back !

[guartz]

Maybe if you quoted different parts, you could have come across as original. That's point-for-point, though.

It's point for point in the pdf like that too.

[Koyangi]

Those looked like Hannity talking points.

Then Yabby finds the source and it's Sara A Carter.com, a "guest" on his show almost every day. I thought you didn't watch Fox News or Hannity?

[BerenTebogo]

The point outline is indeed here https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf (page ix) but, critically, the last point you quoted is a mash-up of points 6 and 7 and could not have been copied from this PDF in that manner.

It's exactly the way that chick wrote it.

Bruh you copied her, not the official PDF.

[Salodin]

Wait wait let me get this straight. You are accusing me of copying that text block from a website, instead of IG report pdf? It's identical text block... Because why .. I'm too stupid to read the pdf? I don't even understand what you are accusing me of?

There are stuff from the IG report that I quoted in my original post that is not in that article? Did I do that just to throw you guys off?

Are you like a paranoid person or something?

Bruh if this was college you would currently be in the Dean's office for plagiarism lmao

The problem isnt you copied it, it's that you copied it and tried to pass it off as your own.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

[Fiye]

ok, it's clear fake news is working overtime to spin this. I encourage you to read and the very minimum the summary

https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf

Omitted Papadopoulos's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in September 2016 denying that anyone associated with the Trump campaign was collaborating with Russia or with outside groups like Wikileaks in the release of emails;

Omitted Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in August 2016 that Page had " literally never met" or "said one word to" Paul Manafort and that Manafort had not responded to any of Page's emails; if true, those statements were in tension with claims in Report 95 that Page was participating in a conspiracy with Russia by acting as an intermediary for Manafort on behalf of the Trump campaign; and Included Page's consensually monitored statements to an FBI CHS in October 2016 that the FBI believed supported its theory that Page was an agent of Russia but omitted other statements Page made that were inconsistent with its theory, including denying having met with Sechin and Divyekin, or even knowing who Divyekin was; if true, those statements contradicted the claims in Report 94 that Page had met secretly with Sechin and Divyekin about future cooperation with Russia and shared derogatory information about candidate Clinton.

To add onto Sath's point shut the fuck up guartz

[guartz]

The point outline is indeed here https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf (page ix) but, critically, the last point you quoted is a mash-up of points 6 and 7 and could not have been copied from this PDF in that manner.

It's exactly the way that chick wrote it.

Bruh you copied her, not the official PDF.

Looks like that pdf has been modified since it came out, point 3 is unredacted.

Here is my copy

[Fiye]

LOL GUARTZ

I'm saving this here

Looks like that pdf has been modified since it came out, point 3 is unredacted.

Here is my copy

[IMG]https://bucket.bluegartr.com/537e50fc0e1fb14356c60c1e280a5ef1.png[/I-G]

[Fiye]

My man guartz just made Sath's point for him.

[Koyangi]

Is this real life or is this Fanta-sea.gif

[Guyverarmor]

Alright, Guartz...keep showing yourself as a complete idiot and pile up the posts... its lunch time and I need something to read after I go get my food !

[guartz]

I'll admit it's odd that we both mashed the "and" paragraphs, but just goes to show at least to me, that great minds think alike.