Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[chazzyphizzle]

I think that was a different poster, right?

twas ol grogglehead

[Zealot]

Whatever happened to that guy?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Zealot]

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/ar...chment/603439/

I got that feeling in my head that you get when being confronted with a solid argument you don't agree with while reading this, so I figured it was worth sharing for discussion.

My major issue is that the author repeatedly cites the "smoking gun" issue when there's a glut of circumstantial evidence tending to prove the case, but my gut tells me he's right about how Republicans are approaching it and reading it does make them appear completely rational.

Now granted, I also saw Nunes's face during Sondland's testimony so I'm not sold on that either, but in a sea of "lol dumb libs got no evidence!" this stood out.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Dimmauk]

That happened again last month but she made it clear they were separated and only still married for insurance reasons this time so no guilt there. The one in law school, she'd fully intended to divorce her husband, she just hadn't told him that.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Classic. It's ok to admit it was hotter after you found out she was married.
Also, Trump sucks

[Roranora]

so what kinda probability we reckon for a cool 20 or so Republican Senators to defect and give us 2/3rds and a conviction

[Tyrath]

0%

[archibaldcrane]

so what kinda probability we reckon for a cool 20 or so Republican Senators to defect and give us 2/3rds and a conviction

On these articles? Less than 1%.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[Tyrath]

They would do it if the votes were anonymous but theres no way any of them are caught dead voting for it in public.

[Zealot]

I would not support anonymous voting for impeachment under any circumstances anyway.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Tyrath]

I know, just highlighting the fact that these fuckers would only do the vote if they didn't have to have their name next to it.

[6souls]

[Roranora]

On these articles? Less than 1%.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Ridill drop rate was like 4-5%?

not looking good boys

[Roranora]

more seriously i'm curious to see how stupidly fast the Senate wraps up its trial

[Tyrath]

I think they are saying 2 weeks of trial with no witnesses.

[archibaldcrane]

It's almost like the framers didn't consider the possibility of political parties

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

[Lokus]

more seriously i'm curious to see how stupidly fast the Senate wraps up its trial

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1205...212190727?s=19

Pretty quick.

[Uzor]

There's no way they vote to impeach him, and the Democrat knows that. Surely they must have something else planned for when the impeachment vote fails? That can't be their end-game.

[Kaslo]

There's no way they vote to impeach him, and the Democrat knows that. Surely they must have something else planned for when the impeachment vote fails? That can't be their end-game.

Actually, there is a near 100% chance he's impeached, he just won't be removed.

[Uzor]

Don't impeachment require a supermajority vote? I highly doubt republicans will vote to impeach him.

[Tyche]

Impeachment happens in the house. He's going to be impeached. Senate has a "trial" and votes on whether or not to remove.