Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[Roranora]

the algorithm thinks i understand spanish

it's got some flaws

[guartz]

Nonsense, algorithm recommends nothing but gaming videos and MSM clips.

Shit like this:

[kuronosan]

Nonsense, algorithm recommends nothing but gaming videos and MSM clips.

Shit like this:

Once again, did you even watch that video?

I feel like the nom d'incompitence with many Trump supporters is reading super heavily into dialogue without actually looking at what is being said.

Don't worry, hardcore left people do it too. Anyone with polarizing mindsets will do it. Anyone with bias will. But it's pretty harrowing that you take this video as unbridled truth of illegal Trump spying but don't actually listen to direct words from the President that are pretty hard to debunk because they DIRECTLY demonstrate criminal intent.

Literally nobody was arguing that the warrant process was flawless.

You're extrapolating that into "THEY WERE ILLEGAL MY LOGIC IS PERFECT LOL".

It's unfortunate, because I know you want to believe your opinion so badly and yet here we are - entertaining a conspiracy so shallow you couldn't get your nose wet.

[Fiye]

It's unfortunate, because I know you want to believe your opinion so badly and yet here we are - entertaining a conspiracy so shallow you couldn't get your nose wet.

There's a reason why I keep asking him about Sandy Hook.

[Guyverarmor]

I agree with Fiye, I really want to know what happened with Sandy Hook.

[guartz]

Once again, did you even watch that video?

I feel like the nom d'incompitence with many Trump supporters is reading super heavily into dialogue without actually looking at what is being said.

Don't worry, hardcore left people do it too. Anyone with polarizing mindsets will do it. Anyone with bias will. But it's pretty harrowing that you take this video as unbridled truth of illegal Trump spying but don't actually listen to direct words from the President that are pretty hard to debunk because they DIRECTLY demonstrate criminal intent.

Literally nobody was arguing that the warrant process was flawless.

You're extrapolating that into "THEY WERE ILLEGAL MY LOGIC IS PERFECT LOL".

It's unfortunate, because I know you want to believe your opinion so badly and yet here we are - entertaining a conspiracy so shallow you couldn't get your nose wet.

wow you got all that from a video I posted as an example of what's in my recommended feed.

When Nunes said FISA was abused a year ago, literally nobody here believed it and I'll remind everyone, Comey said the process was flawless before the IG report came out. He claims now he was wrong, but admitting mistakes after getting caught red handed is too late. Let's see how the story changes after Durham's criminal investigation?

And pretty sure words from the president were "I want nothing, no quid pro quo"

[guartz]

There's a reason why I keep asking him about Sandy Hook.

Huh, 7th time you bring this up. Pretty sure I answered you.

The rules on these forums define trolling a certain way, can you remind me what they are?

[Guyverarmor]

And I am pretty damn sure Guartz your picture is right next to those rules.

[guartz]

And I am pretty damn sure Guartz your picture is right next to those rules.

Listen Bucko, clean your damn room before criticizing others.

[Dimmauk]

wow you got all that from a video I posted as an example of what's in my recommended feed.

When Nunes said FISA was abused a year ago, literally nobody here believed it and I'll remind everyone, Comey said the process was flawless before the IG report came out. He claims now he was wrong, but admitting mistakes after getting caught red handed is too late. Let's see how the story changes after Durham's criminal investigation?

And pretty sure words from the president were "I want nothing, no quid pro quo"

Did Trump tell Zelensky that he wanted nothing? I remember Zelensky asking about the Javelins and Trump saying that he needed a favor.

[Eurell]

Did Trump tell Zelensky that he wanted nothing? I remember Zelensky asking about the Javelins and Trump saying that he needed a favor.

But you see. Trump didn't specifically say the words "I want quid pro quo" so we know he must be innocent.

Unlike Hilary, who specifically yelled "I am murdering americans!" and then did Benghazi.

[Fiye]

Huh, 7th time you bring this up. Pretty sure I answered you.

The rules on these forums define trolling a certain way, can you remind me what they are?

You haven't and you've dodged the question every single time.

[Tarage]

And pretty sure words from the president were "I want nothing, no quid pro quo"

Critical thinking escapes you. When nearly everyone involved had an understanding that yes, what Trump wanted was a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter if he says otherwise. His actions dictated that it was a quid pro quo. All the back channels, the Rudy bullshit, denying the aid in general.

If I started stabbing you in the face while saying "I'm not hurting you", would you be fine with it? Or would you consider the possibility that perhaps my actions aren't matching my words?

[Gredival]

I want you to sleep with me and if you do I'll ignore the fact you're behind on rent. No quid pro quo though. Just a favor for a favor.

[Fiye]

I want you to sleep with me and if you do I'll ignore the fact you're behind on rent. No quid pro quo though. Just a favor for a favor.

You know what they say. When in rome...

[kuronosan]

Y'all are really hoping guartz will engage beyond what he knows.

He's a mini Ben Shapiro.

GOP literally hung up on the need for the words "quid pro quo" as though it's both part of Trump's vocabulary and that the words literally must be said for it to be so.

[Gredival]

You know what they say. When in rome...

[Tyrath]

Y'all are really hoping guartz will engage beyond what he knows.

He's a mini Ben Shapiro.

GOP literally hung up on the need for the words "quid pro quo" as though it's both part of Trump's vocabulary and that the words literally must be said for it to be so.

Did you know, no one gets convicted in court unless they plead guilty because how else would you know they did anything wrong?

[Jaybar]

I remember watching all my employee training videos on sexual harassment and ethical conduct. I especially remember the scene where the employer went up to his female employee and said "I want a quid pro quo."

[kuronosan]

I remember watching a video about sexual harassment where it wasn't harassment unless the manager said "I am sexually harassing you".

Except I don't, because guartz's argument is as stupid as Ben Shapiro and all GOP talking points.