Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[Zealot]

As an attorney I can tell you that once the defendant in any case denies wrongdoing the jury instantly acquires, and any witnesses who testified otherwise are thrown in jail.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[guartz]

Critical thinking escapes you. When nearly everyone involved had an understanding that yes, what Trump wanted was a quid pro quo, it doesn't matter if he says otherwise. His actions dictated that it was a quid pro quo. All the back channels, the Rudy bullshit, denying the aid in general.

If I started stabbing you in the face while saying "I'm not hurting you", would you be fine with it? Or would you consider the possibility that perhaps my actions aren't matching my words?

For your metaphor to be accurate you have to point out that the nobody has evidence that you hurt anybody, people in the room said you didn't hurt anybody and the guy who you were supposedly hurting said "He didn't hurt me." That's why Trump isn't being impeached for quid pro quo, he is being impeached for investigating Biden for his personal gain. "Abuse of Power"

And all Trump has to do, is provide proof that he had good reasons. Tbh I don't know if he has that, I really don't trust Guiliani.

As far as the obstruction of congress article of impeachment, there is a legal opinion floating around that the SC already ruled on it in favor of trump. I've made a previous post about this somewhere on this forum.


It's not all doom and gloom, there is a good probability he might be removed via republican political suicide. A lot of senators do not like Trump. Republican and Democrat.

[guartz]

Did Trump tell Zelensky that he wanted nothing? I remember Zelensky asking about the Javelins and Trump saying that he needed a favor.

Dim, Zelensky was thanking him for the Javelins he already received.

[guartz]

You haven't and you've dodged the question every single time.

I was gonna link where I did reply, but that's just silly. I'll let you continue in your fantasy where you believe that the guy who thinks lizard people are real somehow influences my perspective on the world.

[Yabby]

I was gonna link where I did reply, but that's just silly. I'll let you continue in your fantasy where you believe that the guy who thinks lizard people are real somehow influences my perspective on the world.

But he does. Directly and indirectly. You repeat talking points from far-right conspiracy theory sites... Where do you think they get it from? You are the middle man of a right-winged human centipede cuttlefish eating chain.

[kuronosan]

The problem here guartz is you do the same thing Trump and everyone else does.

You lure people in with statements like "yo I hate Giuliani too lulz" to get people to think you're reasonable just enough to want to listen to your followup. Then you deliver nothing substantial.

I've noticed this pattern in you for a while.

You're almost literally the equivalent of a guy who promises unlimited orgasms and then can't find the clitoris.

[Zealot]

Dim, Zelensky was thanking him for the Javelins he already received.

This is factually incorrect, you can read the transcript the White House provided and see Zelensky says "We are ready to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins,” to which Trump responds, "I would like you to do us a favor though."

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Uzor]

As an attorney I can tell you that once the defendant in any case denies wrongdoing the jury instantly acquires, and any witnesses who testified otherwise are thrown in jail.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Ah, yes, the old "If he does not admit you must acquit" rule. It was truly a monkey court before then.

[Fiye]

I was gonna link where I did reply, but that's just silly. I'll let you continue in your fantasy where you believe that the guy who thinks lizard people are real somehow influences my perspective on the world.

You can't because you never replied you fucking goober.

[Guyverarmor]

The problem here guartz is you do the same thing Trump and everyone else does.

You lure people in with statements like "yo I hate Giuliani too lulz" to get people to think you're reasonable just enough to want to listen to your followup. Then you deliver nothing substantial.

I've noticed this pattern in you for a while.

You're almost literally the equivalent of a guy who promises unlimited orgasms and then can't find the clitoris.

Spot on right here

[Fiye]

I've noticed this pattern in you for a while.

One thing I should note. Guartz rarely puts his own opinion on things. Whenever he tries to state a fact he just links to some shit ass youtube video or just copy pasta's someone else's work.

When he tries to form an original opinion its very uh asousting and honestly I love it. I cherish his OC posts. They're the best posts on this website.

[Zealot]

Has anyone testified under oath that the President didn't do anything wrong? I know a lot of people have said things whom have also refused to be sworn, as opposed to those who were under oath and testified to wrongdoing, did I miss any witnesses?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Roranora]

perjury is a tool of the deep state

[guartz]

The problem here guartz is you do the same thing Trump and everyone else does.

You lure people in with statements like "yo I hate Giuliani too lulz" to get people to think you're reasonable just enough to want to listen to your followup. Then you deliver nothing substantial.

I've noticed this pattern in you for a while.

You're almost literally the equivalent of a guy who promises unlimited orgasms and then can't find the clitoris.

I've been on this forum a long time, I posted about my contempt for Guiliani years ago and that opinion hasn't changed much.

[guartz]

This is factually incorrect, you can read the transcript the White House provided and see Zelensky says "We are ready to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins,” to which Trump responds, "I would like you to do us a favor though."

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

but the sentence right before the one you quoted he thanks Trump for defense support.

[Zealot]

Yes, because they had previously purchased Javelin missiles and now wanted more, your post inferred that thanking Trump for the first missiles is all that occured which is not true.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[guartz]

Has anyone testified under oath that the President didn't do anything wrong? I know a lot of people have said things whom have also refused to be sworn, as opposed to those who were under oath and testified to wrongdoing, did I miss any witnesses?

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Yes. Multiple people.

[Zealot]

Name some, please, I'm legitimately looking for those answers.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[kuronosan]

I've been on this forum a long time, I posted about my contempt for Guiliani years ago and that opinion hasn't changed much.

This literally changes nothing about you.

[guartz]

This literally changes nothing about you.

That's the point. Just makes your assessment ..asinine.