Predisent Donald J. Skroob: Episode X: Purple Raining to Impeachment

[Dimmauk]

Gaurtz believes Sandy hook was a false flag, he is just too much of a coward to admit it.

[Roranora]

holy christ almighty poopdeck

[BerenTebogo]

Jesus.

[Xno Kappa]

Ya need Jesus

[Fiye]

<snip>

I will buy you a fucking christmas gift for giving me one.

[Melena]

Ya need Jesus

[Ophannus]

So when Trump doesn't get removed from office, and he by some chance wins 2020, does that mean we get "Trump's final form"? Like even more unhinged/emboldened, starts cursing regularly in tweets, calling people faggots and assholes all the time, etc. Just like completely obnoxious and invincible shit-eating grin, knowing now he is virtually immune to any punishment since Mueller Report and House Impeachment hasn't stopped him? Because what's gonna happen? They try to impeach him a 2nd time? This is what I'm worried about. Just a sore winner 2nd time Trump, where he knows then that nobody can stop him because he's dodged all the bullets and flak and came out unscathed.

[Fiye]

So when Trump doesn't get removed from office, and he by some chance wins 2020, does that mean we get "2nd form Trump"? Like even more unhinged/emboldened, starts cursing regularly in tweets, calling people faggots and assholes, etc. Just like completely obnoxious and invincible shit-eating grin, knowing now he is virtually immune to any punishment since Mueller Report and House Impeachment hasn't stopped him?

He gets covered in gold.

[Ophannus]

Pelosi knows if the current Senate tries Trump, it's a 100% loss. If she bides her time and uses the successful impeachment as a smoke signal to any and all accusers/whistleblowers step forward, there could be more evidence.

Also, I wonder if the Whistleblower will reveal themselves. I mean, the accusations are all but worthless during trial without a testimony, right? I don't think you can testify under anonymity. Also I wonder if Trump himself will finally have to take the stand, in which case lightning fast concise questioning without wiggle room for bullshit will only further bury him because the guy sucks at telling the truth and being consistent. The type of guy who will perjure himself to hell in seconds. Then again, the Republican senators will likely just ask him dumb as shit leading questions like "Mr. President was there a Quid Pro Quo?" "No." "There you have it, case dismissed"

[Roranora]

NRA tappy ad: Do NOT let them take YOUR guns

ok thx

[Fiye]

This one is for dummy and zealot.

https://twitter.com/RightWingWatch/s...489840130?s=19

[Zealot]

I don't think you can ban someone for not answering a question.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Tarage]

I don't think you can ban someone for not answering a question.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

I'll answer any question you want. It's not about the question, it's about being a little bitch about dodging said question. And I wanted to call the little bitch out.

[Zealot]

Also it is a fairly amazing proposition to say that while holding a trial you will not allow the calling of witnesses and only the results of the investigation.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

[Eurell]

I for sure saw Guartz answer this lol. Was towards the bottom of one of the pages. Maybe it ended up in the wrong thread? Ugh, i'll go look I guess

[Tarage]

I for sure saw Guartz answer this lol. Was towards the bottom of one of the pages. Maybe it ended up in the wrong thread? Ugh, i'll go look I guess

If I'm wrong and somehow missed it I will willingly submit myself as being the bitch.

[Fiye]

He posted a jordan peterson video in response to one of my questions but I personally don't count that as an answer.

also lol jordan peterson.

[Eurell]

Yeah I legit can't find it in this thread. I swear he responded at some point and said it wasn't a hoax though

[Cantih]

I don't think you can ban someone for not answering a question.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

You can, it's happened before. And I believe Gred going HAM on someone just for that, then them getting banned, occurred just weeks before his name turned blue.

EDIT: Specifically, it's the nature of the kind of person, where avoiding answering because the only way they can answer would either cause their house of cards to fall apart, or a bald faced lie that can't be dodged, goes along with other behavior that IS bannable. Just dodging the question is not exactly the bannable offense, but one that is follows shortly after.

[Tarage]

Yeah I legit can't find it in this thread. I swear he responded at some point and said it wasn't a hoax though

Then it'd be perfectly easy for him to come in and link said post, or just answer it again. What's so hard about saying yes or no? I'd even accept an "I don't know". Literally anything except being the biggest bitch baby possible.